TY - JOUR
T1 - Strategy for the treatment of unresectable hepatoblastoma
T2 - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by delayed primary operation or liver transplantation
AU - Urata, Hisashi
AU - Hori, Hiroki
AU - Uchida, Keiichi
AU - Inoue, Mikihiro
AU - Komada, Yoshihiro
AU - Kusunoki, Masato
PY - 2004/4
Y1 - 2004/4
N2 - We present our experience in using neoadjuvant regional and systemic chemotherapy together with surgical resection as a strategy for the treatment of unresectable hepatoblastoma. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given prior to surgical treatment in six children with unresectable hepatoblastoma. Furthermore, the neoadjuvant chemotherapy was intensified according to response to the initial treatment. Surgical resection was performed when the tumor was judged to be resectable. The adjuvant chemotherapy was given after delayed primary operation. Five of six children receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy responded to the treatment and subsequently received delayed primary operation or living donor liver transplantation. All five children who had successful surgery have completed treatment and show no evidence of disease to date (27-115 months after surgery). It is concluded that neoadjuvant chemotherapy given as a combination of regional and systemic chemotherapy was effective for tumor reduction in cases with early stage or stage III disease. Also, to increase the cure rate of children with localized disease that was still unresectable after chemotherapy, living donor liver transplantation, which offers some advantage in timing of transplant compared with cadaveric liver transplantation, seems to be a possible procedure.
AB - We present our experience in using neoadjuvant regional and systemic chemotherapy together with surgical resection as a strategy for the treatment of unresectable hepatoblastoma. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given prior to surgical treatment in six children with unresectable hepatoblastoma. Furthermore, the neoadjuvant chemotherapy was intensified according to response to the initial treatment. Surgical resection was performed when the tumor was judged to be resectable. The adjuvant chemotherapy was given after delayed primary operation. Five of six children receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy responded to the treatment and subsequently received delayed primary operation or living donor liver transplantation. All five children who had successful surgery have completed treatment and show no evidence of disease to date (27-115 months after surgery). It is concluded that neoadjuvant chemotherapy given as a combination of regional and systemic chemotherapy was effective for tumor reduction in cases with early stage or stage III disease. Also, to increase the cure rate of children with localized disease that was still unresectable after chemotherapy, living donor liver transplantation, which offers some advantage in timing of transplant compared with cadaveric liver transplantation, seems to be a possible procedure.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3142776184&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3142776184&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 15285242
AN - SCOPUS:3142776184
SN - 0020-8868
VL - 89
SP - 95
EP - 99
JO - International Surgery
JF - International Surgery
IS - 2
ER -