TY - JOUR
T1 - Subsequent shock deliveries are associated with increased favorable neurological outcomes in cardiac arrest patients who had initially non-shockable rhythms
AU - and on behalf of the SOS-KANTO 2012 Study Group
AU - Kitamura, Nobuya
AU - Nakada, Taka aki
AU - Shinozaki, Koichiro
AU - Tahara, Yoshio
AU - Sakurai, Atsushi
AU - Yonemoto, Naohiro
AU - Nagao, Ken
AU - Yaguchi, Arino
AU - Morimura, Naoto
AU - Inokuchi, Sadaki
AU - Masui, Yoshihiro
AU - Miura, Kunihisa
AU - Tsutsumi, Haruhiko
AU - Takuma, Kiyotsugu
AU - Atsushi, Ishihara
AU - Nakano, Minoru
AU - Tanaka, Hiroshi
AU - Ikegami, Keiichi
AU - Arai, Takao
AU - Yaguchi, Arino
AU - Kitamura, Nobuya
AU - Oda, Shigeto
AU - Kobayashi, Kenji
AU - Suda, Takayuki
AU - Ono, Kazuyuki
AU - Morimura, Naoto
AU - Furuya, Ryosuke
AU - Koido, Yuichi
AU - Iwase, Fumiaki
AU - Nagao, Ken
AU - Kanesaka, Shigeru
AU - Okada, Yasusei
AU - Unemoto, Kyoko
AU - Sadahiro, Tomohito
AU - Iyanaga, Masayuki
AU - Muraoka, Asaki
AU - Hayashi, Munehiro
AU - Ishimatsu, Shinichi
AU - Miyake, Yasufumi
AU - Yokokawa, Hideo
AU - Koyama, Yasuaki
AU - Tsuchiya, Asuka
AU - Kashiyama, Tetsuya
AU - Hayashi, Munetaka
AU - Oshima, Kiyohiro
AU - Kiyota, Kazuya
AU - Hamabe, Yuichi
AU - Yokota, Hiroyuki
AU - Hori, Shingo
AU - Kobe, Yoshiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Kitamura et al.
PY - 2015/9/10
Y1 - 2015/9/10
N2 - Introduction: Previous studies evaluating whether subsequent conversion to shockable rhythms in patients who had initially non-shockable rhythms was associated with altered clinical outcome reported inconsistent results. Therefore, we hypothesized that subsequent shock delivery by emergency medical service (EMS) providers altered clinical outcomes in patients with initially non-shockable rhythms. Methods: We tested for an association between subsequent shock delivery in EMS resuscitation and clinical outcomes in patients with initially non-shockable rhythms (n = 11,481) through a survey of patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the Kanto region (SOS-KANTO) 2012 study cohort, Japan. The primary investigated outcome was 1-month survival with favorable neurological functions. The secondary outcome variable was the presence of subsequent shock delivery. We further evaluated the association of interval from initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation to shock with clinical outcomes. Results: In the univariate analysis of initially non-shockable rhythms, patients who received subsequent shock delivery had significantly increased frequency of return of spontaneous circulation, 24-hour survival, 1-month survival, and favorable neurological outcomes compared to the subsequent not shocked group (P <0.0001). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, subsequent shock was significantly associated with favorable neurological outcomes (vs. not shocked; adjusted P = 0.0020, odds ratio, 2.78; 95 % confidence interval, 1.45-5.30). Younger age, witnessed arrest, initial pulseless electrical activity rhythms, and cardiac etiology were significantly associated with the presence of subsequent shock in patients with initially non-shockable rhythms. Conclusions: In this study of cardiac arrest patients with initially non-shockable rhythms, patients who received early defibrillation by EMS providers had increased 1-month favorable neurological outcomes.
AB - Introduction: Previous studies evaluating whether subsequent conversion to shockable rhythms in patients who had initially non-shockable rhythms was associated with altered clinical outcome reported inconsistent results. Therefore, we hypothesized that subsequent shock delivery by emergency medical service (EMS) providers altered clinical outcomes in patients with initially non-shockable rhythms. Methods: We tested for an association between subsequent shock delivery in EMS resuscitation and clinical outcomes in patients with initially non-shockable rhythms (n = 11,481) through a survey of patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the Kanto region (SOS-KANTO) 2012 study cohort, Japan. The primary investigated outcome was 1-month survival with favorable neurological functions. The secondary outcome variable was the presence of subsequent shock delivery. We further evaluated the association of interval from initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation to shock with clinical outcomes. Results: In the univariate analysis of initially non-shockable rhythms, patients who received subsequent shock delivery had significantly increased frequency of return of spontaneous circulation, 24-hour survival, 1-month survival, and favorable neurological outcomes compared to the subsequent not shocked group (P <0.0001). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, subsequent shock was significantly associated with favorable neurological outcomes (vs. not shocked; adjusted P = 0.0020, odds ratio, 2.78; 95 % confidence interval, 1.45-5.30). Younger age, witnessed arrest, initial pulseless electrical activity rhythms, and cardiac etiology were significantly associated with the presence of subsequent shock in patients with initially non-shockable rhythms. Conclusions: In this study of cardiac arrest patients with initially non-shockable rhythms, patients who received early defibrillation by EMS providers had increased 1-month favorable neurological outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940981435&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940981435&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13054-015-1028-0
DO - 10.1186/s13054-015-1028-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 26353809
AN - SCOPUS:84940981435
SN - 1364-8535
VL - 19
JO - Critical Care
JF - Critical Care
IS - 1
M1 - 322
ER -