TY - JOUR
T1 - Systemic acute-phase response in laparoscopic and open ileal pouch anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis
T2 - A case-matched comparative study
AU - Okita, Yoshiki
AU - Araki, Toshimitsu
AU - Hiro, Junichiro
AU - Ide, Shozo
AU - Imaoka, Hiroki
AU - Kondo, Satoru
AU - Kawamura, Mikio
AU - Fujikawa, Hiroyuki
AU - Inoue, Mikihiro
AU - Toiyama, Yuji
AU - Ohi, Masaki
AU - Tanaka, Koji
AU - Inoue, Yasuhiro
AU - Uchida, Keiichi
AU - Mohri, Yasuhiko
AU - Kusunoki, Masato
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/11/11
Y1 - 2015/11/11
N2 - Aim: The current trial was designed to study and compare the postoperative outcomes and systemic acute responses between patients undergoing laparoscopic-ileal pouch anal anastomosis (LAP-IPAA) and open IPAA for ulcerative colitis. Methods: The clinical records of patients who underwent 89 restorative proctocolectomy procedures with IPAA were reviewed. After determining which patients underwent LAP-IPAA versus open IPAA, an equivalent number of controls matched for age and ulcerative colitis severity were selected. Results: Twenty of 22 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery met the inclusion criteria. Patients who underwent LAP-IPAA had significantly shorter times to first walking (P=0.021) and food intake (P=0.0003). The LAP-IPAA group had significantly lower interleukin-6 and interleukin-1ra levels soon after surgery (P=0.011 and P=0.0076). The LAP-IPAA group had significantly lower C-reactive protein levels on postoperative day 1 (P=0.0027). Conclusions: LAP-IPAA is a less-invasive operative procedure than open IPAA with respect to the postoperative systemic inflammatory response and postoperative recovery.
AB - Aim: The current trial was designed to study and compare the postoperative outcomes and systemic acute responses between patients undergoing laparoscopic-ileal pouch anal anastomosis (LAP-IPAA) and open IPAA for ulcerative colitis. Methods: The clinical records of patients who underwent 89 restorative proctocolectomy procedures with IPAA were reviewed. After determining which patients underwent LAP-IPAA versus open IPAA, an equivalent number of controls matched for age and ulcerative colitis severity were selected. Results: Twenty of 22 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery met the inclusion criteria. Patients who underwent LAP-IPAA had significantly shorter times to first walking (P=0.021) and food intake (P=0.0003). The LAP-IPAA group had significantly lower interleukin-6 and interleukin-1ra levels soon after surgery (P=0.011 and P=0.0076). The LAP-IPAA group had significantly lower C-reactive protein levels on postoperative day 1 (P=0.0027). Conclusions: LAP-IPAA is a less-invasive operative procedure than open IPAA with respect to the postoperative systemic inflammatory response and postoperative recovery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943186793&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943186793&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000128
DO - 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000128
M3 - Article
C2 - 25730740
AN - SCOPUS:84943186793
SN - 1530-4515
VL - 25
SP - 424
EP - 429
JO - Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques
JF - Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques
IS - 5
ER -