Abstract
Aim: The current trial was designed to study and compare the postoperative outcomes and systemic acute responses between patients undergoing laparoscopic-ileal pouch anal anastomosis (LAP-IPAA) and open IPAA for ulcerative colitis. Methods: The clinical records of patients who underwent 89 restorative proctocolectomy procedures with IPAA were reviewed. After determining which patients underwent LAP-IPAA versus open IPAA, an equivalent number of controls matched for age and ulcerative colitis severity were selected. Results: Twenty of 22 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery met the inclusion criteria. Patients who underwent LAP-IPAA had significantly shorter times to first walking (P=0.021) and food intake (P=0.0003). The LAP-IPAA group had significantly lower interleukin-6 and interleukin-1ra levels soon after surgery (P=0.011 and P=0.0076). The LAP-IPAA group had significantly lower C-reactive protein levels on postoperative day 1 (P=0.0027). Conclusions: LAP-IPAA is a less-invasive operative procedure than open IPAA with respect to the postoperative systemic inflammatory response and postoperative recovery.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 424-429 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 11-11-2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Surgery
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Systemic acute-phase response in laparoscopic and open ileal pouch anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis: A case-matched comparative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver