TY - JOUR
T1 - Team dynamics in emergency surgery teams
T2 - results from a first international survey
AU - the Team Dynamics Study Group
AU - Cobianchi, Lorenzo
AU - Dal Mas, Francesca
AU - Massaro, Maurizio
AU - Fugazzola, Paola
AU - Coccolini, Federico
AU - Kluger, Yoram
AU - Leppäniemi, Ari
AU - Moore, Ernest E.
AU - Sartelli, Massimo
AU - Angelos, Peter
AU - Ansaloni, Luca
AU - Abdelmalik, Abubaker
AU - Abebe, Nebyou Seyoum
AU - Abu-Zidan, Fikri M.
AU - Adam, Yousif Abdallah Yousif
AU - Adamou, Harissou
AU - Agrusa, Antonino
AU - Akin, Emrah
AU - Alexandrino, Henrique
AU - Ali, Syed Muhammad
AU - Almeida, Pedro Miguel
AU - Amico, Francesco
AU - Ammendola, Michele
AU - Andreuccetti, Jacopo
AU - Aparicio-Sánchez, Daniel
AU - Ardito, Antonella
AU - Argenio, Giulio
AU - Askevold, Ingolf Harald
AU - Atanasov, Boyko Tchavdarov
AU - Augustin, Goran
AU - Awad, Selmy Sabry
AU - Bagnoli, Carlo
AU - Bains, Lovenish
AU - Balalis, Dimitrios
AU - Baldini, Edoardo
AU - Baraket, Oussama
AU - Barone, Mirko
AU - Barreras, Jorge Arturo
AU - Bellanova, Giovanni
AU - Biancuzzi, Helena
AU - Bignell, Mark Brian
AU - Bini, Roberto
AU - Bissacco, Daniele
AU - Boati, Paoll
AU - Bottari, Andrea
AU - Bouliaris, Konstantinos
AU - Brillantino, Antonio
AU - Buonomo, Luis Antonio
AU - Buscemi, Salvatore
AU - Kobe, Yoshiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Background: Emergency surgery represents a unique context. Trauma teams are often multidisciplinary and need to operate under extreme stress and time constraints, sometimes with no awareness of the trauma’s causes or the patient’s personal and clinical information. In this perspective, the dynamics of how trauma teams function is fundamental to ensuring the best performance and outcomes. Methods: An online survey was conducted among the World Society of Emergency Surgery members in early 2021. 402 fully filled questionnaires on the topics of knowledge translation dynamics and tools, non-technical skills, and difficulties in teamwork were collected. Data were analyzed using the software R, and reported following the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). Results: Findings highlight how several surgeons are still unsure about the meaning and potential of knowledge translation and its mechanisms. Tools like training, clinical guidelines, and non-technical skills are recognized and used in clinical practice. Others, like patients’ and stakeholders’ engagement, are hardly implemented, despite their increasing importance in the modern healthcare scenario. Several difficulties in working as a team are described, including the lack of time, communication, training, trust, and ego. Discussion: Scientific societies should take the lead in offering training and support about the abovementioned topics. Dedicated educational initiatives, practical cases and experiences, workshops and symposia may allow mitigating the difficulties highlighted by the survey’s participants, boosting the performance of emergency teams. Additional investigation of the survey results and its characteristics may lead to more further specific suggestions and potential solutions.
AB - Background: Emergency surgery represents a unique context. Trauma teams are often multidisciplinary and need to operate under extreme stress and time constraints, sometimes with no awareness of the trauma’s causes or the patient’s personal and clinical information. In this perspective, the dynamics of how trauma teams function is fundamental to ensuring the best performance and outcomes. Methods: An online survey was conducted among the World Society of Emergency Surgery members in early 2021. 402 fully filled questionnaires on the topics of knowledge translation dynamics and tools, non-technical skills, and difficulties in teamwork were collected. Data were analyzed using the software R, and reported following the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). Results: Findings highlight how several surgeons are still unsure about the meaning and potential of knowledge translation and its mechanisms. Tools like training, clinical guidelines, and non-technical skills are recognized and used in clinical practice. Others, like patients’ and stakeholders’ engagement, are hardly implemented, despite their increasing importance in the modern healthcare scenario. Several difficulties in working as a team are described, including the lack of time, communication, training, trust, and ego. Discussion: Scientific societies should take the lead in offering training and support about the abovementioned topics. Dedicated educational initiatives, practical cases and experiences, workshops and symposia may allow mitigating the difficulties highlighted by the survey’s participants, boosting the performance of emergency teams. Additional investigation of the survey results and its characteristics may lead to more further specific suggestions and potential solutions.
KW - Knowledge translation
KW - Non-technical skills
KW - Team dynamics
KW - Trauma leaders
KW - Trauma teams
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115206542&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85115206542&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13017-021-00389-6
DO - 10.1186/s13017-021-00389-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 34530891
AN - SCOPUS:85115206542
SN - 1749-7922
VL - 16
JO - World Journal of Emergency Surgery
JF - World Journal of Emergency Surgery
IS - 1
M1 - 47
ER -