The comparison of parotid gland carcinoma and submandibular gland carcinoma―Results of a multi institutional retrospective study

  • Koichiro Yamada
  • , Keigo Honda
  • , Shinzo Tanaka
  • , Hisanobu Tamaki
  • , Tsuyoshi Kojima
  • , Shogo Shinohara
  • , Shinji Takebayashi
  • , Toshiki Maetani
  • , Ryo Asato
  • , Ichiro Tateya
  • , Morimasa Kitamura
  • , Masanobu Mizuta
  • , Yoshiharu Kitani
  • , Koji Ushiro
  • , Kazuyuki Ichimaru
  • , Yohei Kumabe
  • , Koichi Omori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: Parotid gland carcinoma (PGC) and submandibular gland carcinoma (SMGC) are relatively rare. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical outcomes of PGC and SMGC. Patients: Our study included 260 patients(195 with PGC and 65 with SMGC) who underwent initial surgical treatment at Kyoto University and its affiliated hospitals between 2006 and 2015. Results: A total of 44% of the PGCs and 58% of the SMGCs were classified as high-grade malignancies. The sensitivity of fine-needle aspiration cytology was 50% for PGC and 75% for SMGC. At a mean follow-up time of 3.6 years, the 3-year overall survival, disease-specific survival (DSS), locoregional control, and no distant metastasis (NDM) rates for PGC were 85 %, 89 %, 85 %, and 87 %, respectively, while those for SMGC were 74 %, 74 %, 90 %, and 65 %, respectively. Furthermore, the DSS and NDM rates for SMGC were statistically significantly lower than those for PGC. Conclusions: In comparison to PGC, SMGC has a higher risk of distant metastasis and a poorer DSS rate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-45
Number of pages7
JournalJapanese Journal of Head and Neck Cancer
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The comparison of parotid gland carcinoma and submandibular gland carcinoma―Results of a multi institutional retrospective study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this