TY - JOUR
T1 - The “make a flower bud and push at neck” technique
T2 - A safe and versatile technique for Woven EndoBridge treatment
AU - Tanabe, Jun
AU - Nakahara, Ichiro
AU - Matsumoto, Shoji
AU - Morioka, Jun
AU - Hashimoto, Tetsuya
AU - Koge, Junpei
AU - Suyama, Kenichiro
AU - Suzuki, Takeya
AU - Hasebe, Akiko
AU - Watanabe, Sadayoshi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - Purpose: The safety and efficacy of Woven EndoBridge (WEB) treatment has been proven. However, only a few standard techniques for safe and versatile WEB deployment have been described in the literature. In this study, we introduce the “make a flower bud and push at neck” technique to achieve safety and versatility during WEB treatment, referred to simply as the “flower bud” technique. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent WEB treatment between January 2021 and October 2023 were included. We dichotomized the techniques of WEB deployment into two: the “flower bud” technique and the ordinary unsheath technique. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics of the aneurysms, and treatment results were compared between the two techniques to evaluate the safety and versatility of the “flower bud” technique. Results: Of 100 aneurysms, 96 were eligible in the study. The “flower bud” technique was applied in 79 aneurysms (82.3 %), and the ordinary unsheath technique was applied in 17 aneurysms (17.7 %). The aneurysm location significantly differed between both techniques. The degree of parent artery-aneurysm (PA) angle and the proportion of the PA angle ≥ 45° were significantly higher in the “flower bud” technique than in the ordinary unsheath technique (P = 0.024 and P = 0.009, respectively). Effective angiographical results and low morbidity/mortality rate were similar in the techniques, although intraoperative rupture was experienced in one aneurysm treated using the ordinary unsheath technique. Conclusion: The “make a flower bud and push at neck” technique could be safer and more versatile in treating cerebral aneurysms by WEB compared to the ordinary unsheath technique.
AB - Purpose: The safety and efficacy of Woven EndoBridge (WEB) treatment has been proven. However, only a few standard techniques for safe and versatile WEB deployment have been described in the literature. In this study, we introduce the “make a flower bud and push at neck” technique to achieve safety and versatility during WEB treatment, referred to simply as the “flower bud” technique. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent WEB treatment between January 2021 and October 2023 were included. We dichotomized the techniques of WEB deployment into two: the “flower bud” technique and the ordinary unsheath technique. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics of the aneurysms, and treatment results were compared between the two techniques to evaluate the safety and versatility of the “flower bud” technique. Results: Of 100 aneurysms, 96 were eligible in the study. The “flower bud” technique was applied in 79 aneurysms (82.3 %), and the ordinary unsheath technique was applied in 17 aneurysms (17.7 %). The aneurysm location significantly differed between both techniques. The degree of parent artery-aneurysm (PA) angle and the proportion of the PA angle ≥ 45° were significantly higher in the “flower bud” technique than in the ordinary unsheath technique (P = 0.024 and P = 0.009, respectively). Effective angiographical results and low morbidity/mortality rate were similar in the techniques, although intraoperative rupture was experienced in one aneurysm treated using the ordinary unsheath technique. Conclusion: The “make a flower bud and push at neck” technique could be safer and more versatile in treating cerebral aneurysms by WEB compared to the ordinary unsheath technique.
KW - Aneurysm
KW - Intraoperative rupture
KW - Make a flower bud and push at neck technique
KW - Woven EndoBridge
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85210715713&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85210715713&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110942
DO - 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110942
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85210715713
SN - 0967-5868
VL - 132
JO - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
JF - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
M1 - 110942
ER -