Abstract
We review the diagnostic accuracy of T-factor, and discuss the role of CT and MR imaging in staging lung cancer. CT and MR imaging show almost the same diagnostic accuracy, but currently CT is considered more useful than MR and the first diagnostic modality in staging lung cancer due to its superior spatial and time resolution. MR imaging is better than CT for the detection of pleural, chest-wall and mediastinal invasion due to its superior contrast resolution and multidirectional imaging capability. MR imaging should be used as the imaging modality to solve the specific question raised by CT, or to take the information which is difficult to get by CT.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 843-851 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Japanese Journal of Clinical Radiology |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| Publication status | Published - 1996 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The role of CT and MR imaging in staging lung cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver