TY - JOUR
T1 - Three-dimensional simulation of wall impingement and graft bending in anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction using weight-bearing upright multi-detector CT
AU - Sasaki, Ryo
AU - Niki, Yasuo
AU - Kaneda, Kazuya
AU - Yamada, Yoshitake
AU - Harato, Kengo
AU - Kobayashi, Shu
AU - Nagura, Takeo
AU - Nakamura, Masaya
AU - Jinzaki, Masahiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s)
PY - 2026/1
Y1 - 2026/1
N2 - Purpose: Graft-notch impingement and large graft bending angle (GBA) in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) carry a risk of graft failure and subsequent poor postoperative outcomes. Most studies have analyzed the impingement rate and GBA using computed tomography (CT) in the supine position, but not in the standing condition. This study aimed to assess the graft impingement and GBA using upright multi-detector CT (MDCT). Methods: We analyzed 43 knee joints of 23 healthy volunteers (women, n = 13; men, n = 10) in a single-leg standing position using an upright 320-detector-row CT. We defined the putative position of the graft tunnel in three-dimensional models and assessed the impingement rate and GBA of both the anteromedial (AMB) and posterolateral bundles (PLB). Result: The impingement rate for the AMB with a 6-mm graft diameter (81.4 %) was significantly higher than that for the PLB (0.7 %; P < 0.001). The modified AMB tunnel position, which connects the midpoint between the traditional AM and PL tunnel apertures of the femur to the most medial point within the tibial AM footprint, reduced the impingement rate by 14.0 % (P < 0.001). The impingement rate of the modified AMB with a 10-mm graft diameter (32.6 %) was significantly lower than that of the traditional AMB with a 6-mm graft diameter (81.4 %; P < 0.001). The GBA of the modified AMB was significantly smaller than that of the traditional AMB (P < 0.001). Conclusion: This study indicated high graft-notch impingement rates and large GBA for traditional AMB in the standing position, highlighting potential biomechanical challenges associated with traditional double-bundle ACLR configurations.
AB - Purpose: Graft-notch impingement and large graft bending angle (GBA) in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) carry a risk of graft failure and subsequent poor postoperative outcomes. Most studies have analyzed the impingement rate and GBA using computed tomography (CT) in the supine position, but not in the standing condition. This study aimed to assess the graft impingement and GBA using upright multi-detector CT (MDCT). Methods: We analyzed 43 knee joints of 23 healthy volunteers (women, n = 13; men, n = 10) in a single-leg standing position using an upright 320-detector-row CT. We defined the putative position of the graft tunnel in three-dimensional models and assessed the impingement rate and GBA of both the anteromedial (AMB) and posterolateral bundles (PLB). Result: The impingement rate for the AMB with a 6-mm graft diameter (81.4 %) was significantly higher than that for the PLB (0.7 %; P < 0.001). The modified AMB tunnel position, which connects the midpoint between the traditional AM and PL tunnel apertures of the femur to the most medial point within the tibial AM footprint, reduced the impingement rate by 14.0 % (P < 0.001). The impingement rate of the modified AMB with a 10-mm graft diameter (32.6 %) was significantly lower than that of the traditional AMB with a 6-mm graft diameter (81.4 %; P < 0.001). The GBA of the modified AMB was significantly smaller than that of the traditional AMB (P < 0.001). Conclusion: This study indicated high graft-notch impingement rates and large GBA for traditional AMB in the standing position, highlighting potential biomechanical challenges associated with traditional double-bundle ACLR configurations.
KW - Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
KW - Anteromedial bundle
KW - Double-bundle
KW - Graft bending angle
KW - Graft-notch impingement
KW - Upright computed tomography
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105022449818
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105022449818#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.knee.2025.11.003
DO - 10.1016/j.knee.2025.11.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 41271493
AN - SCOPUS:105022449818
SN - 0968-0160
VL - 58
JO - Knee
JF - Knee
M1 - 104277
ER -