Time course of changes in corticospinal excitability induced by motor imagery during action observation combined with peripheral nerve electrical stimulation

Takahito Yasui, Tomofumi Yamaguchi, Shigeo Tanabe, Tsuyoshi Tatemoto, Yoko Takahashi, Kunitsugu Kondo, Michiyuki Kawakami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While previous studies assessed corticospinal excitability changes during and after motor imagery (MI) or action observation (AO) combined with peripheral nerve electrical stimulation (ES), we examined, for the first time, the time course of corticospinal excitability changes for MI during AO combined with ES (AO–MI + ES) using transcranial magnetic stimulation to measure motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in healthy individuals. Fourteen healthy volunteers participated in the following three sessions on different days: AO–MI alone, ES alone, and AO–MI + ES. In the AO–MI task, participants imagined squeezing and relaxing a ball, along with the respective actions shown in a movie, while passively holding the ball. We applied ES (intensity, 90% of the motor threshold) to the ulnar nerve at the wrist, which innervates the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. We assessed the FDI muscle MEPs at baseline and after every 5 min of the task for a total of 20 min. Additionally, participants completed the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire-2 (VMIQ-2) at the beginning of the experiment. Compared to baseline, AO–MI + ES significantly increased corticospinal excitability after 10 min, while AO–MI or ES alone had no effect on corticospinal excitability after 20 min. Moreover, the AO–MI + ES-induced cortical excitability changes were correlated with the VMIQ-2 scores for visual and kinaesthetic imagery. Collectively, our findings indicate that AO–MI + ES induces cortical plasticity earlier than does AO–MI or ES alone and that an individual’s imagery ability plays an important role in inducing cortical excitability changes following AO–MI + ES.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)637-645
Number of pages9
JournalExperimental Brain Research
Volume237
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 04-03-2019

Fingerprint

Imagery (Psychotherapy)
Peripheral Nerves
Electric Stimulation
Observation
Motor Evoked Potentials
Muscles
Ulnar Nerve
Aptitude
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Motion Pictures
Wrist
Healthy Volunteers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Yasui, Takahito ; Yamaguchi, Tomofumi ; Tanabe, Shigeo ; Tatemoto, Tsuyoshi ; Takahashi, Yoko ; Kondo, Kunitsugu ; Kawakami, Michiyuki. / Time course of changes in corticospinal excitability induced by motor imagery during action observation combined with peripheral nerve electrical stimulation. In: Experimental Brain Research. 2019 ; Vol. 237, No. 3. pp. 637-645.
@article{c09a1bd3a4874fe69f1647d7bfc93254,
title = "Time course of changes in corticospinal excitability induced by motor imagery during action observation combined with peripheral nerve electrical stimulation",
abstract = "While previous studies assessed corticospinal excitability changes during and after motor imagery (MI) or action observation (AO) combined with peripheral nerve electrical stimulation (ES), we examined, for the first time, the time course of corticospinal excitability changes for MI during AO combined with ES (AO–MI + ES) using transcranial magnetic stimulation to measure motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in healthy individuals. Fourteen healthy volunteers participated in the following three sessions on different days: AO–MI alone, ES alone, and AO–MI + ES. In the AO–MI task, participants imagined squeezing and relaxing a ball, along with the respective actions shown in a movie, while passively holding the ball. We applied ES (intensity, 90{\%} of the motor threshold) to the ulnar nerve at the wrist, which innervates the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. We assessed the FDI muscle MEPs at baseline and after every 5 min of the task for a total of 20 min. Additionally, participants completed the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire-2 (VMIQ-2) at the beginning of the experiment. Compared to baseline, AO–MI + ES significantly increased corticospinal excitability after 10 min, while AO–MI or ES alone had no effect on corticospinal excitability after 20 min. Moreover, the AO–MI + ES-induced cortical excitability changes were correlated with the VMIQ-2 scores for visual and kinaesthetic imagery. Collectively, our findings indicate that AO–MI + ES induces cortical plasticity earlier than does AO–MI or ES alone and that an individual’s imagery ability plays an important role in inducing cortical excitability changes following AO–MI + ES.",
author = "Takahito Yasui and Tomofumi Yamaguchi and Shigeo Tanabe and Tsuyoshi Tatemoto and Yoko Takahashi and Kunitsugu Kondo and Michiyuki Kawakami",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-018-5454-5",
language = "English",
volume = "237",
pages = "637--645",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

Time course of changes in corticospinal excitability induced by motor imagery during action observation combined with peripheral nerve electrical stimulation. / Yasui, Takahito; Yamaguchi, Tomofumi; Tanabe, Shigeo; Tatemoto, Tsuyoshi; Takahashi, Yoko; Kondo, Kunitsugu; Kawakami, Michiyuki.

In: Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 237, No. 3, 04.03.2019, p. 637-645.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time course of changes in corticospinal excitability induced by motor imagery during action observation combined with peripheral nerve electrical stimulation

AU - Yasui, Takahito

AU - Yamaguchi, Tomofumi

AU - Tanabe, Shigeo

AU - Tatemoto, Tsuyoshi

AU - Takahashi, Yoko

AU - Kondo, Kunitsugu

AU - Kawakami, Michiyuki

PY - 2019/3/4

Y1 - 2019/3/4

N2 - While previous studies assessed corticospinal excitability changes during and after motor imagery (MI) or action observation (AO) combined with peripheral nerve electrical stimulation (ES), we examined, for the first time, the time course of corticospinal excitability changes for MI during AO combined with ES (AO–MI + ES) using transcranial magnetic stimulation to measure motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in healthy individuals. Fourteen healthy volunteers participated in the following three sessions on different days: AO–MI alone, ES alone, and AO–MI + ES. In the AO–MI task, participants imagined squeezing and relaxing a ball, along with the respective actions shown in a movie, while passively holding the ball. We applied ES (intensity, 90% of the motor threshold) to the ulnar nerve at the wrist, which innervates the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. We assessed the FDI muscle MEPs at baseline and after every 5 min of the task for a total of 20 min. Additionally, participants completed the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire-2 (VMIQ-2) at the beginning of the experiment. Compared to baseline, AO–MI + ES significantly increased corticospinal excitability after 10 min, while AO–MI or ES alone had no effect on corticospinal excitability after 20 min. Moreover, the AO–MI + ES-induced cortical excitability changes were correlated with the VMIQ-2 scores for visual and kinaesthetic imagery. Collectively, our findings indicate that AO–MI + ES induces cortical plasticity earlier than does AO–MI or ES alone and that an individual’s imagery ability plays an important role in inducing cortical excitability changes following AO–MI + ES.

AB - While previous studies assessed corticospinal excitability changes during and after motor imagery (MI) or action observation (AO) combined with peripheral nerve electrical stimulation (ES), we examined, for the first time, the time course of corticospinal excitability changes for MI during AO combined with ES (AO–MI + ES) using transcranial magnetic stimulation to measure motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in healthy individuals. Fourteen healthy volunteers participated in the following three sessions on different days: AO–MI alone, ES alone, and AO–MI + ES. In the AO–MI task, participants imagined squeezing and relaxing a ball, along with the respective actions shown in a movie, while passively holding the ball. We applied ES (intensity, 90% of the motor threshold) to the ulnar nerve at the wrist, which innervates the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. We assessed the FDI muscle MEPs at baseline and after every 5 min of the task for a total of 20 min. Additionally, participants completed the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire-2 (VMIQ-2) at the beginning of the experiment. Compared to baseline, AO–MI + ES significantly increased corticospinal excitability after 10 min, while AO–MI or ES alone had no effect on corticospinal excitability after 20 min. Moreover, the AO–MI + ES-induced cortical excitability changes were correlated with the VMIQ-2 scores for visual and kinaesthetic imagery. Collectively, our findings indicate that AO–MI + ES induces cortical plasticity earlier than does AO–MI or ES alone and that an individual’s imagery ability plays an important role in inducing cortical excitability changes following AO–MI + ES.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058054372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058054372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-018-5454-5

DO - 10.1007/s00221-018-5454-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85058054372

VL - 237

SP - 637

EP - 645

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

IS - 3

ER -