TY - JOUR
T1 - Transurethral resection of the prostate immediately after high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for prostate cancer
AU - Sumitomo, Makoto
AU - Asakuma, Junichi
AU - Sato, Akinori
AU - Ito, Keiichi
AU - Nagakura, Kazuhiko
AU - Asano, Tomohiko
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2010/11
Y1 - 2010/11
N2 - Objectives: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) immediately after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for prostate cancer (CaP).Methods: The present retrospective study included 65 CaP patients who underwent HIFU alone and 64 patients who underwent TURP immediately after HIFU. HIFU treatment was carried out using a Sonablate-500 HIFU device (Focus Surgery, Indianapolis, IN, USA). International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the occurrence of urinary complications, such as urethral stricture during follow-up, were statistically compared between groups.Results: Clinical stage tended to be lower for the HIFU+TURP group (P=0.0311), but none of the preoperative parameters differed significantly between groups. Both catheterization time (P<0.0001) and post-treatment IPSS (P<0.0001) at 6, 12, and 24months after treatment differed significantly between groups. Urethral strictures were noted in 16 (24.6%) of the HIFU-only patients and seven (10.9%) of the HIFU+TURP patients. Bladder neck contracture was noted in 11 (68.8%) of the patients with urethral stricture in the HIFU-only group, but in just two (28.6%) of the patients with urethral stricture in the HIFU+TURP group. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that TURP resection volume (P=0.0118) was a strong factor for the prevention of urethral stricture.Conclusions: Our results suggest that combining HIFU with an immediately following TURP improves post-treatment urinary status without causing additional morbidity.
AB - Objectives: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) immediately after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for prostate cancer (CaP).Methods: The present retrospective study included 65 CaP patients who underwent HIFU alone and 64 patients who underwent TURP immediately after HIFU. HIFU treatment was carried out using a Sonablate-500 HIFU device (Focus Surgery, Indianapolis, IN, USA). International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the occurrence of urinary complications, such as urethral stricture during follow-up, were statistically compared between groups.Results: Clinical stage tended to be lower for the HIFU+TURP group (P=0.0311), but none of the preoperative parameters differed significantly between groups. Both catheterization time (P<0.0001) and post-treatment IPSS (P<0.0001) at 6, 12, and 24months after treatment differed significantly between groups. Urethral strictures were noted in 16 (24.6%) of the HIFU-only patients and seven (10.9%) of the HIFU+TURP patients. Bladder neck contracture was noted in 11 (68.8%) of the patients with urethral stricture in the HIFU-only group, but in just two (28.6%) of the patients with urethral stricture in the HIFU+TURP group. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that TURP resection volume (P=0.0118) was a strong factor for the prevention of urethral stricture.Conclusions: Our results suggest that combining HIFU with an immediately following TURP improves post-treatment urinary status without causing additional morbidity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958552196&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77958552196&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02638.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02638.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 20969640
AN - SCOPUS:77958552196
SN - 0919-8172
VL - 17
SP - 924
EP - 930
JO - International Journal of Urology
JF - International Journal of Urology
IS - 11
ER -