TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease
T2 - Past, present and future
AU - Martin, Paul J.
AU - Inamoto, Yoshihiro
AU - Carpenter, Paul A.
AU - Lee, Stephanie J.
AU - Flowers, Mary E.D.
PY - 2011/9
Y1 - 2011/9
N2 - Chronic GVHD was recognized as a complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation more than 30 years ago, but progress has been slowed by the limited insight into the pathogenesis of the disease and the mechanisms that lead to development of immunological tolerance. Only 6 randomized phase III treatment studies have been reported. Results of retrospective studies and prospective phase II clinical trials suggested overall benefit from treatment with mycophenolate mofetil or thalidomide, but these results were not substantiated by phase III studies of initial systemic treatment for chronic GVHD. A comprehensive review of published reports showed numerous deficiencies in studies of secondary treatment for chronic GVHD. Fewer than 10% of reports documented an effort to minimize patient selection bias, used a consistent treatment regimen, or tested a formal statistical hypothesis that was based on a contemporaneous or historical benchmark. In order to enable valid comparison of the results from different studies, eligibility criteria, definitions of individual organ and overall response, and time of assessment should be standardized. Improved treatments are more likely to emerge if reviewers and journal editors hold authors to higher standards in evaluating manuscripts for publication.
AB - Chronic GVHD was recognized as a complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation more than 30 years ago, but progress has been slowed by the limited insight into the pathogenesis of the disease and the mechanisms that lead to development of immunological tolerance. Only 6 randomized phase III treatment studies have been reported. Results of retrospective studies and prospective phase II clinical trials suggested overall benefit from treatment with mycophenolate mofetil or thalidomide, but these results were not substantiated by phase III studies of initial systemic treatment for chronic GVHD. A comprehensive review of published reports showed numerous deficiencies in studies of secondary treatment for chronic GVHD. Fewer than 10% of reports documented an effort to minimize patient selection bias, used a consistent treatment regimen, or tested a formal statistical hypothesis that was based on a contemporaneous or historical benchmark. In order to enable valid comparison of the results from different studies, eligibility criteria, definitions of individual organ and overall response, and time of assessment should be standardized. Improved treatments are more likely to emerge if reviewers and journal editors hold authors to higher standards in evaluating manuscripts for publication.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859818703&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859818703&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5045/kjh.2011.46.3.153
DO - 10.5045/kjh.2011.46.3.153
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84859818703
SN - 1738-7949
VL - 46
SP - 153
EP - 163
JO - Korean Journal of Hematology
JF - Korean Journal of Hematology
IS - 3
ER -