TY - JOUR
T1 - Tumor Depth Prediction of Gastric Cancer With a T4 Score
AU - Taniguchi, Kiyoaki
AU - Ota, Masaho
AU - Yamada, Takuji
AU - Serizawa, Akiko
AU - Kotake, Sho
AU - Ito, Shunichi
AU - Suzuki, Kazuomi
AU - Yamamoto, Masalazu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 International Institute of Anticancer Research.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background/Aim: Peritoneal metastases are often found at surgery of pT4 gastric cancers, preventing R0 resection. In the event of successful R0 resection, distant metastases still occur in a sizeable proportion of patients. Estimation of the depth of invasion has a relatively low accuracy (57%-86%) compared with pathological findings. This study sought to develop a clinical score to distinguish between pathological stage T4 (pT4) and pT1-3 gastric cancer. Patients and Methods: Reviewing the data of 2,771 patients who had undergone gastrectomy at our hospital from January 1996-December 2016, we assessed demographic factors plus tumor markers, diameter, location, histology, and macroscopic type according to the fifth edition (2019) of the WHO classification. Significant factors on multivariate analysis were used to develop a pT4 gastric cancer depth prediction score (T4 score). Results: Multivariate analysis revealed that the clinical factors associated with pT4 disease were CA19-9 elevation, tumor diameter ≥50 mm, poorly cohesive type adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, and WHO macroscopic types 2-4. The T4 score was obtained by weighing these factors according to the β-coefficient. The optimum cutoff value of the T4 score was 4 points. A total of 79.4% of cases with a T4 score ≥4 points were stage pT4. A total of 93.9% of cases with a T4 score <4 points were stage pT1-3, with 91.1% sensitivity, 85.3% specificity, 79.4% positive predictive value, and 93.9% negative predictive value. Conclusion: T4 scoring can differentiate pT4 gastric cancer from pT1-3 gastric cancer.
AB - Background/Aim: Peritoneal metastases are often found at surgery of pT4 gastric cancers, preventing R0 resection. In the event of successful R0 resection, distant metastases still occur in a sizeable proportion of patients. Estimation of the depth of invasion has a relatively low accuracy (57%-86%) compared with pathological findings. This study sought to develop a clinical score to distinguish between pathological stage T4 (pT4) and pT1-3 gastric cancer. Patients and Methods: Reviewing the data of 2,771 patients who had undergone gastrectomy at our hospital from January 1996-December 2016, we assessed demographic factors plus tumor markers, diameter, location, histology, and macroscopic type according to the fifth edition (2019) of the WHO classification. Significant factors on multivariate analysis were used to develop a pT4 gastric cancer depth prediction score (T4 score). Results: Multivariate analysis revealed that the clinical factors associated with pT4 disease were CA19-9 elevation, tumor diameter ≥50 mm, poorly cohesive type adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, and WHO macroscopic types 2-4. The T4 score was obtained by weighing these factors according to the β-coefficient. The optimum cutoff value of the T4 score was 4 points. A total of 79.4% of cases with a T4 score ≥4 points were stage pT4. A total of 93.9% of cases with a T4 score <4 points were stage pT1-3, with 91.1% sensitivity, 85.3% specificity, 79.4% positive predictive value, and 93.9% negative predictive value. Conclusion: T4 scoring can differentiate pT4 gastric cancer from pT1-3 gastric cancer.
KW - Gastric cancer
KW - prediction score
KW - receiver operating characteristics analysis
KW - tumor depth
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85196623892
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85196623892#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.21873/cdp.10154
DO - 10.21873/cdp.10154
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85196623892
SN - 2732-7787
VL - 2
SP - 641
EP - 647
JO - Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis
JF - Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis
IS - 6
ER -