TY - JOUR
T1 - Ultrathin bronchoscopy with multimodal devices for peripheral pulmonary lesions
T2 - A randomized trial
AU - Oki, Masahide
AU - Saka, Hideo
AU - Ando, Masahiko
AU - Asano, Fumihiro
AU - Kurimoto, Noriaki
AU - Morita, Katsuhiko
AU - Kitagawa, Chiyoe
AU - Kogure, Yoshihito
AU - Miyazawa, Teruomi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society.
PY - 2015/8/15
Y1 - 2015/8/15
N2 - Rationale: The combination of an ultrathin bronchoscope, navigational technology, and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) seems to combine the best of mutual abilities for evaluating peripheral pulmonary lesions, but ultrathin bronchoscopes that allow the use of EBUS have not been developed so far. Objectives: To compare the diagnostic yield of transbronchial biopsy under EBUS, fluoroscopy, and virtual bronchoscopic navigation guidance using a novel ultrathin bronchoscope with that using a thin bronchoscope with a guide sheath for peripheral pulmonary lesions. Methods: In four centers, patients with suspected peripheral pulmonary lesions less than or equal to 30 mm in the longest diameter were included and randomized to undergo transbronchial biopsy with EBUS, fluoroscopy, and virtual bronchoscopic navigation guidance using a 3.0-mm ultrathin bronchoscope (UTB group) or a 4.0-mm thin bronchoscope with a guide sheath (TB-GS group). Measurements and Main Results: A total of 310 patients were enrolled and randomized, among whom 305 patients (150, UTB group; 155, TB-GS group) were analyzed. The ultrathin bronchoscope could reach more distal bronchi than the thin bronchoscope (median fifth- vs. fourth-generation bronchi; P < 0.001). Diagnostic histologic specimens were obtained in 74% (42% for benign and 81% for malignant lesions) of the UTB group and 59% (36% for benign and 70% for malignant lesions) of the TB-GS group (P = 0.044, Mantel-Haenszel test). Complications including pneumothorax, bleeding, chest pain, and pneumonia occurred in 3% and 5% in the respective groups. Conclusions: The diagnostic yield of the UTB method is higher than that of the TB-GS method. Clinical trial registered with www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ (UMIN 000003177).
AB - Rationale: The combination of an ultrathin bronchoscope, navigational technology, and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) seems to combine the best of mutual abilities for evaluating peripheral pulmonary lesions, but ultrathin bronchoscopes that allow the use of EBUS have not been developed so far. Objectives: To compare the diagnostic yield of transbronchial biopsy under EBUS, fluoroscopy, and virtual bronchoscopic navigation guidance using a novel ultrathin bronchoscope with that using a thin bronchoscope with a guide sheath for peripheral pulmonary lesions. Methods: In four centers, patients with suspected peripheral pulmonary lesions less than or equal to 30 mm in the longest diameter were included and randomized to undergo transbronchial biopsy with EBUS, fluoroscopy, and virtual bronchoscopic navigation guidance using a 3.0-mm ultrathin bronchoscope (UTB group) or a 4.0-mm thin bronchoscope with a guide sheath (TB-GS group). Measurements and Main Results: A total of 310 patients were enrolled and randomized, among whom 305 patients (150, UTB group; 155, TB-GS group) were analyzed. The ultrathin bronchoscope could reach more distal bronchi than the thin bronchoscope (median fifth- vs. fourth-generation bronchi; P < 0.001). Diagnostic histologic specimens were obtained in 74% (42% for benign and 81% for malignant lesions) of the UTB group and 59% (36% for benign and 70% for malignant lesions) of the TB-GS group (P = 0.044, Mantel-Haenszel test). Complications including pneumothorax, bleeding, chest pain, and pneumonia occurred in 3% and 5% in the respective groups. Conclusions: The diagnostic yield of the UTB method is higher than that of the TB-GS method. Clinical trial registered with www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ (UMIN 000003177).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942511225&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942511225&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1164/rccm.201502-0205OC
DO - 10.1164/rccm.201502-0205OC
M3 - Article
C2 - 26039792
AN - SCOPUS:84942511225
SN - 1073-449X
VL - 192
SP - 468
EP - 476
JO - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
JF - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
IS - 4
ER -