TY - JOUR
T1 - Usefulness of HFA-BDP for adult patients with bronchial asthma
T2 - Randomized crossover study with fluticasone
AU - Horiguchi, Takahiko
AU - Hayashi, Nobuyuki
AU - Ohira, Daisuke
AU - Torigoe, Hiroshi
AU - Ito, Tomohiro
AU - Hirose, Masahiro
AU - Sasaki, Yasushi
AU - Shiga, Mamoru
AU - Miyazaki, Junichi
AU - Kondo, Rieko
AU - Tachikawa, Soichi
PY - 2006/8/1
Y1 - 2006/8/1
N2 - In this randomized crossover study, 22 adult patients with moderate-to-severe persistent bronchial asthma were assigned to one of two groups. Patients in group 1 were administered fluticasone dry powder inhaler (DPI) for 8 weeks followed by a 2-week washout period, then hydrofluoroalkane- beclometasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) for 8 weeks. After a further 2-week washout, they were again administered fluticasone DPI for 8 weeks. Patients in group 2 were assigned HFA-BDP followed by fluticasone PII and finally HFA-BDP over the same time periods. In both groups, no significant difference was observed in use of beta2-agonists and symptom score between the treatment periods; however, markers of pulmonary function were significantly higher when on HFA-BDP versus fluticasone DPI. Significant increases of morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) (p < 0.01), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1.0) (p < 0.01), V50 (p < 0.05), and V 25 (p < 0.01) were observed at 18 weeks in group 1, whereas there were significant decreases of V50 (p < 0.05) at 18 weeks in group 2. No significant difference was noted in circulating eosinophil count and serum ECP between the 2 treatments; however, ECP in induced sputum and nitric oxide in expired gas were significantly lower (p < 0.05 and < 0.01, respectively) when on HFA-BDP versus fluticasone DPI. HFA-BDP might be delivered to small airways more effectively than fluticasone DPI.
AB - In this randomized crossover study, 22 adult patients with moderate-to-severe persistent bronchial asthma were assigned to one of two groups. Patients in group 1 were administered fluticasone dry powder inhaler (DPI) for 8 weeks followed by a 2-week washout period, then hydrofluoroalkane- beclometasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) for 8 weeks. After a further 2-week washout, they were again administered fluticasone DPI for 8 weeks. Patients in group 2 were assigned HFA-BDP followed by fluticasone PII and finally HFA-BDP over the same time periods. In both groups, no significant difference was observed in use of beta2-agonists and symptom score between the treatment periods; however, markers of pulmonary function were significantly higher when on HFA-BDP versus fluticasone DPI. Significant increases of morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) (p < 0.01), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1.0) (p < 0.01), V50 (p < 0.05), and V 25 (p < 0.01) were observed at 18 weeks in group 1, whereas there were significant decreases of V50 (p < 0.05) at 18 weeks in group 2. No significant difference was noted in circulating eosinophil count and serum ECP between the 2 treatments; however, ECP in induced sputum and nitric oxide in expired gas were significantly lower (p < 0.05 and < 0.01, respectively) when on HFA-BDP versus fluticasone DPI. HFA-BDP might be delivered to small airways more effectively than fluticasone DPI.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750000024&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750000024&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02770900600758465
DO - 10.1080/02770900600758465
M3 - Article
C2 - 16939990
AN - SCOPUS:33750000024
SN - 0277-0903
VL - 43
SP - 509
EP - 512
JO - Journal of Asthma
JF - Journal of Asthma
IS - 7
ER -