TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of the efficacy of the prognostic factor score in the Japanese severity criteria for severe acute pancreatitis
T2 - A large multicenter study
AU - Ikeura, Tsukasa
AU - Horibe, Masayasu
AU - Sanui, Masamitsu
AU - Sasaki, Mitsuhito
AU - Kuwagata, Yasuyuki
AU - Nishi, Kenichiro
AU - Kariya, Shuji
AU - Sawano, Hirotaka
AU - Goto, Takashi
AU - Hamada, Tsuyoshi
AU - Oda, Takuya
AU - Yasuda, Hideto
AU - Ogura, Yuki
AU - Miyazaki, Dai
AU - Hirose, Kaoru
AU - Kitamura, Katsuya
AU - Chiba, Nobutaka
AU - Ozaki, Tetsu
AU - Yamashita, Takahiro
AU - Koinuma, Toshitaka
AU - Oshima, Taku
AU - Yamamoto, Tomonori
AU - Hirota, Morihisa
AU - Yamamoto, Satoshi
AU - Oe, Kyoji
AU - Ito, Tetsuya
AU - Iwasaki, Eisuke
AU - Kanai, Takanori
AU - Okazaki, Kazuichi
AU - Mayumi, Toshihiko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, © Author(s) 2016.
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - Background: The Japanese severity criteria for acute pancreatitis (AP), which consist of a prognostic factor score and contrast-enhanced computed tomography grade, have been widely used in Japan. Objective: This large multicenter retrospective study was conducted to validate the predictive value of the prognostic factor score for mortality and complications in severe AP patients in comparison to the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score. Methods: Data of 1159 patients diagnosed with severe AP according to the Japanese severity criteria for AP were retrospectively collected in 44 institutions. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) for the receiver-operating characteristic curve of the prognostic factor score for predicting mortality was 0.78 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74–0.82), whereas the AUC for the APACHE II score was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76–0.83), respectively. There were no significant differences in the AUC for predicting mortality between two scoring systems. The AUCs of the prognostic factor scores for predicting the need for mechanical ventilation, the development of pancreatic infection, and severe AP according to the revised Atlanta classification were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.81–0.86), 0.73 (95% CI, 0.69–0.77), and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.81–0.86), respectively, which were significantly greater than the AUCs for the APACHE II score; 0.81 (95% CI, 0.78–0.83) for the need for mechanical ventilation (p = 0.03), 0.68 (95% CI, 0.63–0.72) for the development of pancreatic infection (p = 0.02), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.77–0.82) for severe AP according to the revised Atlanta classification (p = 0.01). Conclusion: The prognostic factor score has an equivalent ability for predicting mortality compared with the APACHE II score. Regarding the ability for predicting the development of severe complications during the clinical course of AP, the prognostic factor score may be superior to the APACHE II score.
AB - Background: The Japanese severity criteria for acute pancreatitis (AP), which consist of a prognostic factor score and contrast-enhanced computed tomography grade, have been widely used in Japan. Objective: This large multicenter retrospective study was conducted to validate the predictive value of the prognostic factor score for mortality and complications in severe AP patients in comparison to the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score. Methods: Data of 1159 patients diagnosed with severe AP according to the Japanese severity criteria for AP were retrospectively collected in 44 institutions. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) for the receiver-operating characteristic curve of the prognostic factor score for predicting mortality was 0.78 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74–0.82), whereas the AUC for the APACHE II score was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76–0.83), respectively. There were no significant differences in the AUC for predicting mortality between two scoring systems. The AUCs of the prognostic factor scores for predicting the need for mechanical ventilation, the development of pancreatic infection, and severe AP according to the revised Atlanta classification were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.81–0.86), 0.73 (95% CI, 0.69–0.77), and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.81–0.86), respectively, which were significantly greater than the AUCs for the APACHE II score; 0.81 (95% CI, 0.78–0.83) for the need for mechanical ventilation (p = 0.03), 0.68 (95% CI, 0.63–0.72) for the development of pancreatic infection (p = 0.02), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.77–0.82) for severe AP according to the revised Atlanta classification (p = 0.01). Conclusion: The prognostic factor score has an equivalent ability for predicting mortality compared with the APACHE II score. Regarding the ability for predicting the development of severe complications during the clinical course of AP, the prognostic factor score may be superior to the APACHE II score.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019047040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019047040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2050640616670566
DO - 10.1177/2050640616670566
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85019047040
SN - 2050-6406
VL - 5
SP - 389
EP - 397
JO - United European Gastroenterology Journal
JF - United European Gastroenterology Journal
IS - 3
ER -