Abstract
It is unclear at present which mathematical modeling Kt/(V)urea is valid for assessment of both long mild hemodialysis (HD) and short intensive HD, the single-pool modeling Kt/V (Kt/Vsp) based on the pre- and postdialysis serum urea concentrations, double-pool modeling Kt/V (Kt/Vdp) based on the predialysis concentration and the estimated postdialysis equilibrated concentration, or Kt/V calculated on the basis of dialyzer urea clearance, HD session duration and urea distribution volume (Kt/Vdl). Thus, the respective Kt/V during a short intensive HD was compared with its counterpart Kt/V during a long mild HD, where the same amount of urea is removed during both HD treatments. It was found that the Kt/Vsp and Kt/Vdl during short intensive HD were significantly greater than the respective Kt/V during the long mild HD. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the Kt/Vdp between the long mild and short intensive HDs. In conclusion, Kt/Vdp may be more valid for assessment of both long mild and short intensive HDs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 827-831 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Nephron |
| Volume | 92 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2002 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Physiology
- Nephrology
- Urology
- Physiology (medical)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Which Kt/V is the most valid for assessment of both long mild and short intensive hemodialyses?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver