抄録
According to the Clinical Trials Act, which has been enacted since 2018, the Certified Review Board(CRB)has to refer to written opinions of technical experts. The system of technical experts is new, and its actual state and function are still unclear. Here, we conducted a questionnaire survey with 70 participating CRB offices across the country, and a field survey with 12 CRB offices, attempting to clearly show the actual state and issues the technical experts face. Each research institution performs a variety of operations in relation to existing Academic Research Organization(ARO). In the future, it is required that the operations of technical experts make a high-quality review by a CRB.
| 寄稿の翻訳タイトル | An overview of issues of technical experts according to clinical trials act |
|---|---|
| 本文言語 | 日本語 |
| ページ(範囲) | 21-27 |
| ページ数 | 7 |
| ジャーナル | Japanese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics |
| 巻 | 52 |
| 号 | 2 |
| DOI | |
| 出版ステータス | 出版済み - 2021 |
| 外部発表 | はい |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- 薬理学
- 薬理学(医学)
フィンガープリント
「臨床研究法の下での技術専門員の運用状況と課題」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。引用スタイル
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver