TY - JOUR
T1 - A Method of Calculating Functional Independence Measure at Discharge from Functional Independence Measure Effectiveness Predicted by Multiple Regression Analysis Has a High Degree of Predictive Accuracy
AU - Tokunaga, Makoto
AU - Watanabe, Susumu
AU - Sonoda, Shigeru
PY - 2017/9
Y1 - 2017/9
N2 - Background Multiple linear regression analysis is often used to predict the outcome of stroke rehabilitation. However, the predictive accuracy may not be satisfactory. The objective of this study was to elucidate the predictive accuracy of a method of calculating motor Functional Independence Measure (mFIM) at discharge from mFIM effectiveness predicted by multiple regression analysis. Methods The subjects were 505 patients with stroke who were hospitalized in a convalescent rehabilitation hospital. The formula “mFIM at discharge = mFIM effectiveness × (91 points − mFIM at admission) + mFIM at admission” was used. By including the predicted mFIM effectiveness obtained through multiple regression analysis in this formula, we obtained the predicted mFIM at discharge (A). We also used multiple regression analysis to directly predict mFIM at discharge (B). The correlation between the predicted and the measured values of mFIM at discharge was compared between A and B. Result The correlation coefficients were.916 for A and.878 for B. Conclusion Calculating mFIM at discharge from mFIM effectiveness predicted by multiple regression analysis had a higher degree of predictive accuracy of mFIM at discharge than that directly predicted.
AB - Background Multiple linear regression analysis is often used to predict the outcome of stroke rehabilitation. However, the predictive accuracy may not be satisfactory. The objective of this study was to elucidate the predictive accuracy of a method of calculating motor Functional Independence Measure (mFIM) at discharge from mFIM effectiveness predicted by multiple regression analysis. Methods The subjects were 505 patients with stroke who were hospitalized in a convalescent rehabilitation hospital. The formula “mFIM at discharge = mFIM effectiveness × (91 points − mFIM at admission) + mFIM at admission” was used. By including the predicted mFIM effectiveness obtained through multiple regression analysis in this formula, we obtained the predicted mFIM at discharge (A). We also used multiple regression analysis to directly predict mFIM at discharge (B). The correlation between the predicted and the measured values of mFIM at discharge was compared between A and B. Result The correlation coefficients were.916 for A and.878 for B. Conclusion Calculating mFIM at discharge from mFIM effectiveness predicted by multiple regression analysis had a higher degree of predictive accuracy of mFIM at discharge than that directly predicted.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025175551&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85025175551&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.06.028
DO - 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.06.028
M3 - Article
C2 - 28739346
AN - SCOPUS:85025175551
VL - 26
SP - 1923
EP - 1928
JO - Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
JF - Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
SN - 1052-3057
IS - 9
ER -