TY - JOUR
T1 - Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase
T2 - a systematic review and network meta-analysis
AU - Kishi, Taro
AU - Ikuta, Toshikazu
AU - Sakuma, Kenji
AU - Okuya, Makoto
AU - Hatano, Masakazu
AU - Matsuda, Yuki
AU - Iwata, Nakao
N1 - Funding Information:
The present study was funded by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (21K15738) and a Research Grant for Early-Career Scientists from Fujita Health University’s School of Medicine.
Funding Information:
We would like to thank Dr. Masaki Kato (Department of Neuropsychiatry, Kansai Medical University) for providing the article reprint that we were unable to obtain. We would also like to thank MARUZEN-YUSHODO Co., Ltd. (https://kw.maruzen.co.jp/kousei-honyaku/) for the English language editing.
Funding Information:
The interests from the past 3 years are as follows: TK received a speaker’s honoraria from Sumitomo, Eisai, Takeda, Janssen, Otsuka, Meiji, Viatris, MSD, and Tanabe-Mitsubishi, in addition to a research grant from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research C, the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, and Fujita Health University School of Medicine. TI has nothing to disclose. KS received a speaker’s honoraria from Sumitomo, Eisai, Kissei, Meiji, and Otsuka, in addition to a research grant from a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists, the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, and the Fujita Health University School of Medicine Research Grant for Early-Career Scientists. MH received a speaker’s honoraria from Sumitomo, Janssen, Kyowa, Otsuka, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, and Yoshitomi. MO received speaker’s honoraria from Sumitomo, Eisai, Kissei, Meiji, and Otsuka, in addition to a research grant from a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (21K15738) and the Fujita Health University School of Medicine Research Grant for Early-Career Scientists. YM received a speaker’s honoraria from Sumitomo, Janssen, Kyowa, Otsuka, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, and Yoshitomi, in addition to a research grant from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development. NI received a speaker’s honoraria from Sumitomo, Eisai, Takeda, Eli Lilly, Viatris, Janssen, Otsuka, Meiji, Shionogi, and Tanabe-Mitsubishi, in addition to research grants from Eisai, Takeda, Sumitomo, and Otsuka. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding the subject of this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - A systematic review and random-effects model network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of antidepressants to treat adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) in the maintenance phase. This study searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases and included only double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials with an enrichment design: patients were stabilized on the antidepressant of interest during the open-label study and then randomized to receive the same antidepressant or placebo. The outcomes were the 6-month relapse rate (primary outcome, efficacy), all-cause discontinuation (acceptability), discontinuation due to adverse events (tolerability), and the incidence of individual adverse events. The risk ratio with a 95% credible interval was calculated. The meta-analysis comprised 34 studies (n = 9384, mean age = 43.80 years, and %females = 68.10%) on 20 antidepressants (agomelatine, amitriptyline, bupropion, citalopram, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, levomilnacipran, milnacipran, mirtazapine, nefazodone, paroxetine, reboxetine, sertraline, tianeptine, venlafaxine, vilazodone, and vortioxetine) and a placebo. In terms of the 6-month relapse rate, amitriptyline, citalopram, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, mirtazapine, nefazodone, paroxetine, reboxetine, sertraline, tianeptine, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine outperformed placebo. Compared to placebo, desvenlafaxine, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine had lower all-cause discontinuation; however, sertraline had a higher discontinuation rate due to adverse events. Compared to placebo, venlafaxine was associated with a lower incidence of dizziness, while desvenlafaxine, sertraline, and vortioxetine were associated with a higher incidence of nausea/vomiting. In conclusion, desvenlafaxine, paroxetine, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine had reasonable efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability in the treatment of adults with stable MDD.
AB - A systematic review and random-effects model network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of antidepressants to treat adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) in the maintenance phase. This study searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases and included only double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials with an enrichment design: patients were stabilized on the antidepressant of interest during the open-label study and then randomized to receive the same antidepressant or placebo. The outcomes were the 6-month relapse rate (primary outcome, efficacy), all-cause discontinuation (acceptability), discontinuation due to adverse events (tolerability), and the incidence of individual adverse events. The risk ratio with a 95% credible interval was calculated. The meta-analysis comprised 34 studies (n = 9384, mean age = 43.80 years, and %females = 68.10%) on 20 antidepressants (agomelatine, amitriptyline, bupropion, citalopram, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, levomilnacipran, milnacipran, mirtazapine, nefazodone, paroxetine, reboxetine, sertraline, tianeptine, venlafaxine, vilazodone, and vortioxetine) and a placebo. In terms of the 6-month relapse rate, amitriptyline, citalopram, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, mirtazapine, nefazodone, paroxetine, reboxetine, sertraline, tianeptine, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine outperformed placebo. Compared to placebo, desvenlafaxine, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine had lower all-cause discontinuation; however, sertraline had a higher discontinuation rate due to adverse events. Compared to placebo, venlafaxine was associated with a lower incidence of dizziness, while desvenlafaxine, sertraline, and vortioxetine were associated with a higher incidence of nausea/vomiting. In conclusion, desvenlafaxine, paroxetine, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine had reasonable efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability in the treatment of adults with stable MDD.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139989928&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85139989928&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41380-022-01824-z
DO - 10.1038/s41380-022-01824-z
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85139989928
VL - 28
SP - 402
EP - 409
JO - Molecular Psychiatry
JF - Molecular Psychiatry
SN - 1359-4184
IS - 1
ER -