メインナビゲーションにスキップ 検索にスキップ メインコンテンツにスキップ

Carbapenems versus alternative antibiotics for the treatment of bloodstream infections caused by Enterobacter, Citrobacter or Serratia species: A systematic review with meta-analysis

  • Patrick N.A. Harris
  • , Jane Y. Wei
  • , Andrew W. Shen
  • , Ahmed A. Abdile
  • , Stuart Paynter
  • , Rachel R. Huxley
  • , Nirmala Pandeya
  • , Yohei Doi
  • , Kyungmin Huh
  • , Catherine S. O'Neal
  • , Thomas R. Talbot
  • , David L. Paterson

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿 › 学術論文 › 査読

抄録

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared effects of different antibiotics on mortality in patients with bloodstream infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae with chromosomal AmpC β-lactamase. Methods: Databases were systematically searched for studies reporting mortality in patients with bloodstream infections caused by AmpC producers treated with carbapenems, broad-spectrum β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs), quinolones or cefepime. Pooled ORs for mortality were calculated for cases that received monotherapy with these agents versus carbapenems. Registration: PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42014014992; 18 November 2014). Results: Eleven observational studies were included. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed on studies reporting empirical and definitive monotherapy. In unadjusted analyses, no significant difference in mortality was found between BLBLIs versus carbapenems used for definitive therapy (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.32-2.36) or empirical therapy (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.14-1.60) or cefepime versus carbapenems as definitive therapy (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.27-1.38) or empirical therapy (0.60; 95% CI 0.17-2.20). Use of a fluoroquinolone as definitive therapy was associated with a lower risk of mortality compared with carbapenems (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.19-0.78). Three studies with patient-level data were used to adjust for potential confounders. The non-significant trends favouring non-carbapenem options in these studies were diminished after adjustment for age, sex and illness severity scores, suggestive of residual confounding. Conclusions: Despite limitations of available data, there was no strong evidence to suggest that BLBLIs, quinolones or cefepime were inferior to carbapenems. The reduced risk of mortality observed with quinolone use may reflect less serious illness in patients, rather than superiority over carbapenems.

本文言語英語
ページ(範囲)296-306
ページ数11
ジャーナルJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
巻71
号2
DOI
出版ステータス出版済み - 01-02-2016
外部発表はい

UN SDG

この成果は、次の持続可能な開発目標に貢献しています

  1. SDG 3 - すべての人に健康と福祉を
    SDG 3 すべての人に健康と福祉を

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • 薬理学
  • 微生物学(医療)
  • 薬理学(医学)
  • 感染症

フィンガープリント

「Carbapenems versus alternative antibiotics for the treatment of bloodstream infections caused by Enterobacter, Citrobacter or Serratia species: A systematic review with meta-analysis」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル