TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a Conversion Table Linking Functional Independence Measure Scores to International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Qualifiers
T2 - Insights from a Survey of Healthcare Professionals
AU - Umemori, Shu
AU - Ogawa, Mao
AU - Yamada, Shin
AU - Komatsu, Masayo
AU - Oikawa, Emiko
AU - Okamoto, Yasuyo
AU - Katoh, Masaki
AU - Shirasaka, Tomohide
AU - Abiko, Kagari
AU - Moriizumi, Shigehiro
AU - Matsuo, Yuichiro
AU - Tohyama, Harukazu
AU - Mukaino, Masahiko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the authors.
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - In clinical practice, patient assessments rely on established scales. Integrating data from these scales into the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework has been suggested; however, a standardized approach is lacking. Herein, we tested a new approach to develop a conversion table translating clinical scale scores into ICF qualifiers based on a clinician survey. The survey queried rehabilitation professionals about which functional independence measure (FIM) item scores (1–7) corresponded to the ICF qualifiers (0–4). A total of 458 rehabilitation professionals participated. The survey findings indicated a general consensus on the equivalence of FIM scores with ICF qualifiers. The median value for each item remained consistent across all item groups. Specifically, FIM 1 had a median value of 4; FIM 2 and 3 both had median values of 3; FIM 4 and 5 both had median values of 2; FIM 6 had a median value of 1; and FIM 7 had a median value of 0. Despite limitations due to the irreconcilable differences between the frameworks of existing scales and the ICF, these results underline the ICF’s potential to serve as a central hub for integrating clinical data from various scales.
AB - In clinical practice, patient assessments rely on established scales. Integrating data from these scales into the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework has been suggested; however, a standardized approach is lacking. Herein, we tested a new approach to develop a conversion table translating clinical scale scores into ICF qualifiers based on a clinician survey. The survey queried rehabilitation professionals about which functional independence measure (FIM) item scores (1–7) corresponded to the ICF qualifiers (0–4). A total of 458 rehabilitation professionals participated. The survey findings indicated a general consensus on the equivalence of FIM scores with ICF qualifiers. The median value for each item remained consistent across all item groups. Specifically, FIM 1 had a median value of 4; FIM 2 and 3 both had median values of 3; FIM 4 and 5 both had median values of 2; FIM 6 had a median value of 1; and FIM 7 had a median value of 0. Despite limitations due to the irreconcilable differences between the frameworks of existing scales and the ICF, these results underline the ICF’s potential to serve as a central hub for integrating clinical data from various scales.
KW - ICF
KW - functioning
KW - qualifiers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85191297362&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85191297362&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/healthcare12080831
DO - 10.3390/healthcare12080831
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85191297362
SN - 2227-9032
VL - 12
JO - Healthcare (Switzerland)
JF - Healthcare (Switzerland)
IS - 8
M1 - 831
ER -