TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a Prognostic Model for Patients Aged ≤65 Years With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
AU - JK-FOOT study group
AU - Oishi, Yuya
AU - Matsushita, Yuto
AU - Watanabe, Shinya
AU - Watanabe, Kyohei
AU - Watanabe, Hiromitsu
AU - Tamura, Keita
AU - Motoyama, Daisuke
AU - Yanagisawa, Takafumi
AU - Mori, Keiichiro
AU - Sugiyama, Seitetsu
AU - Bekku, Kensuke
AU - Toyoda, Shingo
AU - Nukaya, Takuhisa
AU - Maenosono, Ryoichi
AU - Komura, Kazumasa
AU - Araki, Motoo
AU - Fujita, Kazutoshi
AU - Takahara, Kiyoshi
AU - Azuma, Haruhito
AU - Inamoto, Teruo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026. International Institute of Anticancer Research. All rights reserved.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Background/Aim: Existing prognostic models for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) were developed using all-age cohorts, and their validity in non-elderly patients remains unclear. We aimed to develop and validate our prognostic model for patients aged ≤65 years with mRCC, including non-clear cell histologies, and to establish a practical risk stratification system. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 210 patients with mRCC from multiple Japanese institutions. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Independent prognostic factors were identified using a multivariable Cox regression analysis. A simplified scoring system was constructed to stratify patients into risk groups. Model discrimination was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), with internal validation by bootstrap resampling. Clinical utility was assessed by a decision curve analysis (DCA). A nomogram was constructed based on the identified independent prognostic factors. Results: During a median follow-up of 57 months, 77 OS events occurred; median OS was 65.7 months. Histopathological type, liver metastasis, C-reactive protein, serum-corrected calcium, and time to systemic therapy were independently associated with worse OS. Our prognostic model stratified patients into favorable- (n=89), intermediate- (n=76), and poor- (n=45) risk groups, with median OS of 95.1, 37.7, and 9.6 months, respectively (p<0.001). The 5-year C-index was 0.74, exceeding that of the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) model (0.70). In DCA, our prognostic model showed higher net benefit across threshold of 0.3-0.6, corresponding to an average reduction of 3.26 unnecessary treatment escalations per 100 patients. The nomogram showed time-dependent C-indices of 0.83, 0.84, and 0.87 at 1, 3, and 5 years. Conclusion: Our prognostic model provides superior discrimination to and higher clinical utility than the IMDC model for predicting OS in non-elderly patients with mRCC, supporting age-specific risk stratification in this population.
AB - Background/Aim: Existing prognostic models for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) were developed using all-age cohorts, and their validity in non-elderly patients remains unclear. We aimed to develop and validate our prognostic model for patients aged ≤65 years with mRCC, including non-clear cell histologies, and to establish a practical risk stratification system. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 210 patients with mRCC from multiple Japanese institutions. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Independent prognostic factors were identified using a multivariable Cox regression analysis. A simplified scoring system was constructed to stratify patients into risk groups. Model discrimination was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), with internal validation by bootstrap resampling. Clinical utility was assessed by a decision curve analysis (DCA). A nomogram was constructed based on the identified independent prognostic factors. Results: During a median follow-up of 57 months, 77 OS events occurred; median OS was 65.7 months. Histopathological type, liver metastasis, C-reactive protein, serum-corrected calcium, and time to systemic therapy were independently associated with worse OS. Our prognostic model stratified patients into favorable- (n=89), intermediate- (n=76), and poor- (n=45) risk groups, with median OS of 95.1, 37.7, and 9.6 months, respectively (p<0.001). The 5-year C-index was 0.74, exceeding that of the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) model (0.70). In DCA, our prognostic model showed higher net benefit across threshold of 0.3-0.6, corresponding to an average reduction of 3.26 unnecessary treatment escalations per 100 patients. The nomogram showed time-dependent C-indices of 0.83, 0.84, and 0.87 at 1, 3, and 5 years. Conclusion: Our prognostic model provides superior discrimination to and higher clinical utility than the IMDC model for predicting OS in non-elderly patients with mRCC, supporting age-specific risk stratification in this population.
KW - IMDC criteria
KW - Prognostic model
KW - immune checkpoint inhibitor
KW - non-elderly patients
KW - non–clear cell RCC
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105040666660
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105040666660#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.21873/anticanres.18198
DO - 10.21873/anticanres.18198
M3 - Article
C2 - 42203336
AN - SCOPUS:105040666660
SN - 0250-7005
VL - 46
SP - 3293
EP - 3302
JO - Anticancer research
JF - Anticancer research
IS - 6
ER -