TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of steroid use for stenosis prevention after endoscopic submucosal dissection for cervical esophageal cancer
AU - Muroi, Koichi
AU - Kakushima, Naomi
AU - Furukawa, Kazuhiro
AU - Furune, Satoshi
AU - Ito, Nobuhito
AU - Hirose, Takashi
AU - Ishikawa, Eri
AU - Mizutani, Yasuyuki
AU - Sawada, Tsunaki
AU - Maeda, Keiko
AU - Yamamura, Takeshi
AU - Ishikawa, Takuya
AU - Ohno, Eizaburo
AU - Nakamura, Masanao
AU - Kawashima, Hiroki
AU - Funasaka, Kohei
AU - Miyahara, Ryoji
AU - Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Background and aim: Esophageal stenosis is a serious complication after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for thoracic esophageal cancer (TEC), and steroid has been applied for stenosis prevention. However, the rate of stenosis and effect of steroid for ESD of cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) remain unknown. The aim was to clarify the rate and managements of post-ESD stenosis for CEC. Methods: A total of 325 lesions with 272 patients who underwent ESD for esophageal cancers were enrolled and were divided to the CEC group (43 lesions) or the TEC group (282 lesions). Patient characteristics, clinicopathological features, procedure-related outcomes of esophageal ESD, stenosis rate and clinical outcome of steroid use cases were evaluated. Results: More patients in the CEC group received preventive steroid treatment compared to the TEC group (37.2% vs 14.5%, P = 0.001). The rate of post-ESD stenosis tended to be higher in the CEC group (11.6%) than in the TEC group (6.7%). For cases of 3/4 ≤ of circumference, local injection with oral steroid had lower stenosis rate than local injection only in both groups (CEC 40% vs 100%, TEC 30.7% vs 56.3%). More sessions and longer duration of dilation were needed to release the stenosis in the CEC group (20 times vs. 5 times, P = 0.015; 196 days vs. 55 days, P = 0.043). Conclusion: The post-ESD stenosis rate of CEC tended to be higher than that of TEC. More intensive preventive measures for post-ESD stenosis may be needed for CEC than TEC.
AB - Background and aim: Esophageal stenosis is a serious complication after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for thoracic esophageal cancer (TEC), and steroid has been applied for stenosis prevention. However, the rate of stenosis and effect of steroid for ESD of cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) remain unknown. The aim was to clarify the rate and managements of post-ESD stenosis for CEC. Methods: A total of 325 lesions with 272 patients who underwent ESD for esophageal cancers were enrolled and were divided to the CEC group (43 lesions) or the TEC group (282 lesions). Patient characteristics, clinicopathological features, procedure-related outcomes of esophageal ESD, stenosis rate and clinical outcome of steroid use cases were evaluated. Results: More patients in the CEC group received preventive steroid treatment compared to the TEC group (37.2% vs 14.5%, P = 0.001). The rate of post-ESD stenosis tended to be higher in the CEC group (11.6%) than in the TEC group (6.7%). For cases of 3/4 ≤ of circumference, local injection with oral steroid had lower stenosis rate than local injection only in both groups (CEC 40% vs 100%, TEC 30.7% vs 56.3%). More sessions and longer duration of dilation were needed to release the stenosis in the CEC group (20 times vs. 5 times, P = 0.015; 196 days vs. 55 days, P = 0.043). Conclusion: The post-ESD stenosis rate of CEC tended to be higher than that of TEC. More intensive preventive measures for post-ESD stenosis may be needed for CEC than TEC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124997051&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124997051&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10147-022-02139-3
DO - 10.1007/s10147-022-02139-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 35194703
AN - SCOPUS:85124997051
SN - 1341-9625
VL - 27
SP - 940
EP - 947
JO - International Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - International Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 5
ER -