TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy and safety of ligelizumab in adults and adolescents with chronic spontaneous urticaria
T2 - results of two phase 3 randomised controlled trials
AU - PEARL-1 and PEARL-2 trial investigators
AU - Maurer, Marcus
AU - Ensina, Luis Felipe
AU - Gimenez-Arnau, Ana Maria
AU - Sussman, Gordon
AU - Hide, Michihiro
AU - Saini, Sarbjit
AU - Grattan, Clive
AU - Fomina, Daria
AU - Rigopoulos, Dimitrios
AU - Berard, Frederic
AU - Canonica, Giorgio Walter
AU - Rockmann, Heike
AU - Irani, Carla
AU - Szepietowski, Jacek C.
AU - Leflein, Jeffrey
AU - Bernstein, Jonathan A.
AU - Peter, Jonny G.
AU - Kulthanan, Kanokvalai
AU - Godse, Kiran
AU - Ardusso, Ledit
AU - Ukhanova, Olga
AU - Staubach, Petra
AU - Sinclair, Rodney
AU - Gogate, Shaila
AU - Thomsen, Simon Francis
AU - Tanus, Tonny
AU - Ye, Young Min
AU - Burciu, Alis
AU - Barve, Avantika
AU - Modi, Darshna
AU - Scosyrev, Emil
AU - Hua, Eva
AU - Letzelter, Kerstin
AU - Varanasi, Vineeth
AU - Patekar, Manmath
AU - Severin, Thomas
AU - Rosana, Agondi
AU - Ahmed, Al Waily
AU - Fabio, Almerigogna
AU - Miguel Angel Tejedor, Alonso
AU - Alfred, Ammoury
AU - Eng Kim, Anne Goh
AU - Robert, Anolik
AU - Ledit, Ardusso
AU - Petr, Arenberger
AU - Nandini, A. S.
AU - Mohammad, Asefi
AU - Natalia, Astafieva
AU - Anil, Badhwar
AU - Akiko, Yagami
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024/1/13
Y1 - 2024/1/13
N2 - Background: Many patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) do not achieve complete control of their symptoms with current available treatments. In a dose-finding phase 2b study, ligelizumab improved urticaria symptoms in patients with H1-antihistamine (H1-AH) refractory CSU. Here, we report the efficacy and safety outcomes from two ligelizumab phase 3 studies. Methods: PEARL-1 and PEARL-2 were identically designed randomised, double-blind, active-controlled and placebo-controlled parallel-group studies. Patients aged 12 years or older with moderate-to-severe H1-AH refractory CSU were recruited from 347 sites in 46 countries and randomly allocated in a 3:3:3:1 ratio via Interactive Response Technology to 72 mg ligelizumab, 120 mg ligelizumab, 300 mg omalizumab, or placebo, dosed every 4 weeks, for 52 weeks. Patients allocated to placebo received 120 mg ligelizumab from week 24. The primary endpoint was change-from-baseline (CFB) in weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) at week 12, and was analysed in all eligible adult patients according to the treatment assigned at random allocation. Safety was assessed throughout the study in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. The studies were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03580369 (PEARL-1) and NCT03580356 (PEARL-2). Both trials are now complete. Findings: Between Oct 17, 2018, and Oct 26, 2021, 2057 adult patients were randomly allocated across both studies (72 mg ligelizumab n=614; 120 mg ligelizumab n=616; 300 mg omalizumab n=618, and placebo n=209). A total of 1480 (72%) of 2057 were female, and 577 (28%) of 2057 were male. Mean UAS7 at baseline across study groups ranged from 29·37 to 31·10. At week 12, estimated treatment differences in mean CFB-UAS7 were as follows: for 72 mg ligelizumab versus placebo, –8·0 (95% CI –10·6 to –5·4; PEARL-1), –10·0 (–12·6 to –7·4; PEARL-2); 72 mg ligelizumab versus omalizumab 0·7 (–1·2 to 2·5; PEARL-1), 0·4 (–1·4 to 2·2; PEARL-2); 120 mg ligelizumab versus placebo –8·0 (–10·5 to –5·4; PEARL-1), –11·1 (–13·7 to –8·5; PEARL-2); 120 mg ligelizumab versus omalizumab 0·7 (–1·1 to 2·5; PEARL-1), –0·7 (–2·5 to 1·1; PEARL-2). Both doses of ligelizumab were superior to placebo (p<0·0001), but not to omalizumab, in both studies. No new safety signals were identified for ligelizumab or omalizumab. Interpretation: In the phase 3 PEARL studies, ligelizumab demonstrated superior efficacy versus placebo but not versus omalizumab. The safety profile of ligelizumab was consistent with previous studies. Funding: Novartis Pharma.
AB - Background: Many patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) do not achieve complete control of their symptoms with current available treatments. In a dose-finding phase 2b study, ligelizumab improved urticaria symptoms in patients with H1-antihistamine (H1-AH) refractory CSU. Here, we report the efficacy and safety outcomes from two ligelizumab phase 3 studies. Methods: PEARL-1 and PEARL-2 were identically designed randomised, double-blind, active-controlled and placebo-controlled parallel-group studies. Patients aged 12 years or older with moderate-to-severe H1-AH refractory CSU were recruited from 347 sites in 46 countries and randomly allocated in a 3:3:3:1 ratio via Interactive Response Technology to 72 mg ligelizumab, 120 mg ligelizumab, 300 mg omalizumab, or placebo, dosed every 4 weeks, for 52 weeks. Patients allocated to placebo received 120 mg ligelizumab from week 24. The primary endpoint was change-from-baseline (CFB) in weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) at week 12, and was analysed in all eligible adult patients according to the treatment assigned at random allocation. Safety was assessed throughout the study in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. The studies were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03580369 (PEARL-1) and NCT03580356 (PEARL-2). Both trials are now complete. Findings: Between Oct 17, 2018, and Oct 26, 2021, 2057 adult patients were randomly allocated across both studies (72 mg ligelizumab n=614; 120 mg ligelizumab n=616; 300 mg omalizumab n=618, and placebo n=209). A total of 1480 (72%) of 2057 were female, and 577 (28%) of 2057 were male. Mean UAS7 at baseline across study groups ranged from 29·37 to 31·10. At week 12, estimated treatment differences in mean CFB-UAS7 were as follows: for 72 mg ligelizumab versus placebo, –8·0 (95% CI –10·6 to –5·4; PEARL-1), –10·0 (–12·6 to –7·4; PEARL-2); 72 mg ligelizumab versus omalizumab 0·7 (–1·2 to 2·5; PEARL-1), 0·4 (–1·4 to 2·2; PEARL-2); 120 mg ligelizumab versus placebo –8·0 (–10·5 to –5·4; PEARL-1), –11·1 (–13·7 to –8·5; PEARL-2); 120 mg ligelizumab versus omalizumab 0·7 (–1·1 to 2·5; PEARL-1), –0·7 (–2·5 to 1·1; PEARL-2). Both doses of ligelizumab were superior to placebo (p<0·0001), but not to omalizumab, in both studies. No new safety signals were identified for ligelizumab or omalizumab. Interpretation: In the phase 3 PEARL studies, ligelizumab demonstrated superior efficacy versus placebo but not versus omalizumab. The safety profile of ligelizumab was consistent with previous studies. Funding: Novartis Pharma.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85178245469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85178245469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01684-7
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01684-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 38008109
AN - SCOPUS:85178245469
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 403
SP - 147
EP - 159
JO - The Lancet
JF - The Lancet
IS - 10422
ER -