TY - JOUR
T1 - Endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary adenoma and early adenocarcinoma
T2 - Analysis of factors related to treatment outcome and long-term prognosis
AU - Kawashima, Hiroki
AU - Ohno, Eizaburo
AU - Ishikawa, Takuya
AU - Iida, Tadashi
AU - Tanaka, Hiroyuki
AU - Furukawa, Kazuhiro
AU - Nakamura, Masanao
AU - Honda, Takashi
AU - Hashimoto, Senju
AU - Itoh, Akihiro
AU - Ishigami, Masatoshi
AU - Hirooka, Yoshiki
AU - Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Objectives: There are few reports on the long-term prognosis of papillary tumors after endoscopic papillectomy. Here, we report a retrospective study of the therapeutic effects, long-term prognosis, and affecting factors. Methods: The inclusion criteria were papillary adenoma with/without an adenocarcinoma component on biopsy results and ≤10 mm intraductal extension, and the exclusion criteria were moderate to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma on biopsy results. If no residual lesion was confirmed ≥6 months after the last endoscopic treatment, remission was defined. Subsequently, follow-up endoscopy was scheduled once a year. Surgery was required in the case of adenocarcinoma recurrence or intraductal lesions >10 mm. The rates of adverse events, remission, recurrence, and need for surgery were examined. The affecting factors were calculated. Results: There were a total of 253 subjects, including 65 with adenocarcinoma. Pancreatitis (7.5%), bleeding (9.1%) and perforation (2.8%) were observed as adverse events. Among 221 subjects with ≥6 months of follow-up, 212 (95.9%) were in remission. The cumulative recurrence rate using the Kaplan–Meier analysis at 5 years was 16.9% (22 cases), with the need for surgery in 5.9% (5 cases). Intraductal extension on preoperative diagnosis was the only significant risk factor for both recurrence (P < 0.001) and the need for surgery (P = 0.005). The presence of adenocarcinoma had no significant effect. Conclusion: Although remission was achieved in more than 95% of our patients, we observed a high rate of recurrence at the long-term follow-up, which was significantly associated with intraductal extension but not with the presence of adenocarcinoma.
AB - Objectives: There are few reports on the long-term prognosis of papillary tumors after endoscopic papillectomy. Here, we report a retrospective study of the therapeutic effects, long-term prognosis, and affecting factors. Methods: The inclusion criteria were papillary adenoma with/without an adenocarcinoma component on biopsy results and ≤10 mm intraductal extension, and the exclusion criteria were moderate to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma on biopsy results. If no residual lesion was confirmed ≥6 months after the last endoscopic treatment, remission was defined. Subsequently, follow-up endoscopy was scheduled once a year. Surgery was required in the case of adenocarcinoma recurrence or intraductal lesions >10 mm. The rates of adverse events, remission, recurrence, and need for surgery were examined. The affecting factors were calculated. Results: There were a total of 253 subjects, including 65 with adenocarcinoma. Pancreatitis (7.5%), bleeding (9.1%) and perforation (2.8%) were observed as adverse events. Among 221 subjects with ≥6 months of follow-up, 212 (95.9%) were in remission. The cumulative recurrence rate using the Kaplan–Meier analysis at 5 years was 16.9% (22 cases), with the need for surgery in 5.9% (5 cases). Intraductal extension on preoperative diagnosis was the only significant risk factor for both recurrence (P < 0.001) and the need for surgery (P = 0.005). The presence of adenocarcinoma had no significant effect. Conclusion: Although remission was achieved in more than 95% of our patients, we observed a high rate of recurrence at the long-term follow-up, which was significantly associated with intraductal extension but not with the presence of adenocarcinoma.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098199445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85098199445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/den.13881
DO - 10.1111/den.13881
M3 - Article
C2 - 33107134
AN - SCOPUS:85098199445
VL - 33
SP - 858
EP - 869
JO - Digestive Endoscopy
JF - Digestive Endoscopy
SN - 0915-5635
IS - 5
ER -