Evaluation of 2 scatter correction methods using a striatal phantom for quantitative brain SPECT

Douglass C. Vines, Masanori Ichise, Jeih San Liow, Hiroshi Toyama, Robert B. Innis

研究成果: Article

7 引用 (Scopus)

抄録

Objective: Scatter correction is an important factor in quantitative SPECT. In this study, we evaluated 2 methods of scatter correction for brain SPECT. The first is based on thresholding the energy spectrum (ES), and the second is based on a modification of the transmission-dependent convolution subtraction (TDCS) method. Methods: SPECT imaging of a skull striatal phantom was performed using a triple-head camera with and without scatter correction. The striatal compartments were filled with 123I, and the brain shell cavity (background) was filled with varying concentrations of 123I to obtain striatal-to-background ratios of 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 to 1, respectively, which were considered to be the expected ratios. SPECT-measured ratios of striatal-to-background counts were determined with scatter correction (both ES and TDCS methods) and without scatter correction and were then compared with the expected ratios. Results: Without scatter correction, measured striatal-to-background ratios were underestimated by an average of 41.7%, compared with the expected ratios. The ES method of scatter correction underestimated the striatal-to-background ratios by an average of 27.4%, a significant improvement (P < 0.04) over those without scatter correction. With the TDCS method of scatter correction, the ratios were underestimated by only 3.3% (P < 0.03). TDCS ratios were significantly (P < 0.04) higher than ES ratios and were nearly identical to the expected ratios. Conclusion: These results suggest that scatter correction significantly improves the striatal-to-background ratios. The TDCS method appears to correct scatter more effectively than does the ES method for the striatal phantom, thus providing more accurate quantification.

元の言語English
ページ(範囲)157-160
ページ数4
ジャーナルJournal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
31
発行部数3
出版物ステータスPublished - 01-09-2003
外部発表Yes

Fingerprint

Corpus Striatum
Single-Photon Emission-Computed Tomography
Brain
Skull
Head

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

これを引用

Vines, Douglass C. ; Ichise, Masanori ; Liow, Jeih San ; Toyama, Hiroshi ; Innis, Robert B. / Evaluation of 2 scatter correction methods using a striatal phantom for quantitative brain SPECT. :: Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology. 2003 ; 巻 31, 番号 3. pp. 157-160.
@article{976649c1595440e48d960410ed84d7d2,
title = "Evaluation of 2 scatter correction methods using a striatal phantom for quantitative brain SPECT",
abstract = "Objective: Scatter correction is an important factor in quantitative SPECT. In this study, we evaluated 2 methods of scatter correction for brain SPECT. The first is based on thresholding the energy spectrum (ES), and the second is based on a modification of the transmission-dependent convolution subtraction (TDCS) method. Methods: SPECT imaging of a skull striatal phantom was performed using a triple-head camera with and without scatter correction. The striatal compartments were filled with 123I, and the brain shell cavity (background) was filled with varying concentrations of 123I to obtain striatal-to-background ratios of 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 to 1, respectively, which were considered to be the expected ratios. SPECT-measured ratios of striatal-to-background counts were determined with scatter correction (both ES and TDCS methods) and without scatter correction and were then compared with the expected ratios. Results: Without scatter correction, measured striatal-to-background ratios were underestimated by an average of 41.7{\%}, compared with the expected ratios. The ES method of scatter correction underestimated the striatal-to-background ratios by an average of 27.4{\%}, a significant improvement (P < 0.04) over those without scatter correction. With the TDCS method of scatter correction, the ratios were underestimated by only 3.3{\%} (P < 0.03). TDCS ratios were significantly (P < 0.04) higher than ES ratios and were nearly identical to the expected ratios. Conclusion: These results suggest that scatter correction significantly improves the striatal-to-background ratios. The TDCS method appears to correct scatter more effectively than does the ES method for the striatal phantom, thus providing more accurate quantification.",
author = "Vines, {Douglass C.} and Masanori Ichise and Liow, {Jeih San} and Hiroshi Toyama and Innis, {Robert B.}",
year = "2003",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "157--160",
journal = "Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology",
issn = "0091-4916",
publisher = "Society of Nuclear Medicine Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Evaluation of 2 scatter correction methods using a striatal phantom for quantitative brain SPECT. / Vines, Douglass C.; Ichise, Masanori; Liow, Jeih San; Toyama, Hiroshi; Innis, Robert B.

:: Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 巻 31, 番号 3, 01.09.2003, p. 157-160.

研究成果: Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of 2 scatter correction methods using a striatal phantom for quantitative brain SPECT

AU - Vines, Douglass C.

AU - Ichise, Masanori

AU - Liow, Jeih San

AU - Toyama, Hiroshi

AU - Innis, Robert B.

PY - 2003/9/1

Y1 - 2003/9/1

N2 - Objective: Scatter correction is an important factor in quantitative SPECT. In this study, we evaluated 2 methods of scatter correction for brain SPECT. The first is based on thresholding the energy spectrum (ES), and the second is based on a modification of the transmission-dependent convolution subtraction (TDCS) method. Methods: SPECT imaging of a skull striatal phantom was performed using a triple-head camera with and without scatter correction. The striatal compartments were filled with 123I, and the brain shell cavity (background) was filled with varying concentrations of 123I to obtain striatal-to-background ratios of 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 to 1, respectively, which were considered to be the expected ratios. SPECT-measured ratios of striatal-to-background counts were determined with scatter correction (both ES and TDCS methods) and without scatter correction and were then compared with the expected ratios. Results: Without scatter correction, measured striatal-to-background ratios were underestimated by an average of 41.7%, compared with the expected ratios. The ES method of scatter correction underestimated the striatal-to-background ratios by an average of 27.4%, a significant improvement (P < 0.04) over those without scatter correction. With the TDCS method of scatter correction, the ratios were underestimated by only 3.3% (P < 0.03). TDCS ratios were significantly (P < 0.04) higher than ES ratios and were nearly identical to the expected ratios. Conclusion: These results suggest that scatter correction significantly improves the striatal-to-background ratios. The TDCS method appears to correct scatter more effectively than does the ES method for the striatal phantom, thus providing more accurate quantification.

AB - Objective: Scatter correction is an important factor in quantitative SPECT. In this study, we evaluated 2 methods of scatter correction for brain SPECT. The first is based on thresholding the energy spectrum (ES), and the second is based on a modification of the transmission-dependent convolution subtraction (TDCS) method. Methods: SPECT imaging of a skull striatal phantom was performed using a triple-head camera with and without scatter correction. The striatal compartments were filled with 123I, and the brain shell cavity (background) was filled with varying concentrations of 123I to obtain striatal-to-background ratios of 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 to 1, respectively, which were considered to be the expected ratios. SPECT-measured ratios of striatal-to-background counts were determined with scatter correction (both ES and TDCS methods) and without scatter correction and were then compared with the expected ratios. Results: Without scatter correction, measured striatal-to-background ratios were underestimated by an average of 41.7%, compared with the expected ratios. The ES method of scatter correction underestimated the striatal-to-background ratios by an average of 27.4%, a significant improvement (P < 0.04) over those without scatter correction. With the TDCS method of scatter correction, the ratios were underestimated by only 3.3% (P < 0.03). TDCS ratios were significantly (P < 0.04) higher than ES ratios and were nearly identical to the expected ratios. Conclusion: These results suggest that scatter correction significantly improves the striatal-to-background ratios. The TDCS method appears to correct scatter more effectively than does the ES method for the striatal phantom, thus providing more accurate quantification.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542547223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1542547223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 157

EP - 160

JO - Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

JF - Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

SN - 0091-4916

IS - 3

ER -