TY - JOUR
T1 - Expression profiling of muscles from Fukuyama-type congenital muscular dystrophy and laminin-α2 deficient congenital muscular dystrophy; is congenital muscular dystrophy a primary fibrotic disease?
AU - Taniguchi, Mariko
AU - Kurahashi, Hiroki
AU - Noguchi, Satoru
AU - Sese, Jun
AU - Okinaga, Takeshi
AU - Tsukahara, Toshifumi
AU - Guicheney, Pascale
AU - Ozono, Keiichi
AU - Nishino, Ichizo
AU - Morishita, Shinichi
AU - Toda, Tatsushi
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to Dr. Ikuya Nonaka and Dr. Shin’ichi Takeda for their critical comments and advice, and Dr. Hidetoshi Taniguchi and Dr. Masako Taniike for technical support. We also thank Dr. Jennifer Logan for editing the manuscript. This work was supported by a Health Science Research Grant, Research on Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases and Mental Health and by a Research Grant for Nervous and Mental Disorders (14B-4 and 17A-10), both from the ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan; and by the 21st Century COE program from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan.
PY - 2006/4/7
Y1 - 2006/4/7
N2 - Fukuyama-type congenital muscular dystrophy (FCMD) and laminin-α2 deficient congenital muscular dystrophy (MDC1A) are congenital muscular dystrophies (CMDs) and they both are categorized into the same clinical entity of muscular dystrophy as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). All three disorders share a common etiologic defect in the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex, which connects muscle structural proteins with the extracellular basement membrane. To investigate the pathophysiology of these CMDs, we generated microarray gene expression profiles of skeletal muscle from patients in various clinical stages. Despite diverse pathological changes, the correlation coefficient of overall gene expression among these samples was considerably high. We performed a multi-dimensional statistical analysis, the Distillation, to extract determinant genes that distinguish CMD muscle from normal controls. Up-regulated genes were primarily extracellular matrix (ECM) components, whereas down-regulated genes included structural components of mature muscle. These observations reflect active interstitial fibrosis with less active regeneration of muscle cell components in the CMDs, characteristics that are clearly distinct from those of DMD. Although the severity of fibrosis varied among the specimens tested, ECM gene expression was consistently high without substantial changes through the clinical course. Further, in situ hybridization showed more prominent ECM gene expression on muscle cells than on interstitial tissue cells, suggesting that ECM components are induced by regeneration process rather than by 'dystrophy.' These data imply that the etiology of FCMD and MDC1A differs from that of the chronic phase of classical muscular dystrophy, and the major pathophysiologic change in CMDs might instead result from primary active fibrosis.
AB - Fukuyama-type congenital muscular dystrophy (FCMD) and laminin-α2 deficient congenital muscular dystrophy (MDC1A) are congenital muscular dystrophies (CMDs) and they both are categorized into the same clinical entity of muscular dystrophy as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). All three disorders share a common etiologic defect in the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex, which connects muscle structural proteins with the extracellular basement membrane. To investigate the pathophysiology of these CMDs, we generated microarray gene expression profiles of skeletal muscle from patients in various clinical stages. Despite diverse pathological changes, the correlation coefficient of overall gene expression among these samples was considerably high. We performed a multi-dimensional statistical analysis, the Distillation, to extract determinant genes that distinguish CMD muscle from normal controls. Up-regulated genes were primarily extracellular matrix (ECM) components, whereas down-regulated genes included structural components of mature muscle. These observations reflect active interstitial fibrosis with less active regeneration of muscle cell components in the CMDs, characteristics that are clearly distinct from those of DMD. Although the severity of fibrosis varied among the specimens tested, ECM gene expression was consistently high without substantial changes through the clinical course. Further, in situ hybridization showed more prominent ECM gene expression on muscle cells than on interstitial tissue cells, suggesting that ECM components are induced by regeneration process rather than by 'dystrophy.' These data imply that the etiology of FCMD and MDC1A differs from that of the chronic phase of classical muscular dystrophy, and the major pathophysiologic change in CMDs might instead result from primary active fibrosis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33344460712&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33344460712&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.12.224
DO - 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.12.224
M3 - Article
C2 - 16487936
AN - SCOPUS:33344460712
SN - 0006-291X
VL - 342
SP - 489
EP - 502
JO - Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
JF - Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
IS - 2
ER -