TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Tumor Size on the Difficulty of Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomies
T2 - An International Multicenter Study
AU - Kato, Yutaro
AU - Sugioka, Atsushi
AU - Kojima, Masayuki
AU - Syn, Nicholas L.
AU - Zhongkai, Wang
AU - Liu, Rong
AU - Cipriani, Federica
AU - Armstrong, Thomas
AU - Aghayan, Davit L.
AU - Siow, Tiing Foong
AU - Lim, Chetana
AU - Scatton, Olivier
AU - Herman, Paulo
AU - Coelho, Fabricio Ferreira
AU - Marino, Marco V.
AU - Mazzaferro, Vincenzo
AU - Chiow, Adrian K.H.
AU - Sucandy, Iswanto
AU - Ivanecz, Arpad
AU - Choi, Sung Hoon
AU - Lee, Jae Hoon
AU - Gastaca, Mikel
AU - Vivarelli, Marco
AU - Giuliante, Felice
AU - Dalla Valle, Bernardo
AU - Ruzzenente, Andrea
AU - Yong, Chee Chien
AU - Fondevila, Constantino
AU - Efanov, Mikhail
AU - Di Benedetto, Fabrizio
AU - Belli, Andrea
AU - Park, James O.
AU - Rotellar, Fernando
AU - Choi, Gi Hong
AU - Robles-Campos, Ricardo
AU - Wang, Xiaoying
AU - Sutcliffe, Robert P.
AU - Schmelzle, Moritz
AU - Pratschke, Johann
AU - Lai, Eric C.H.
AU - Chong, Charing C.N.
AU - D’Hondt, Mathieu
AU - Monden, Kazuteru
AU - Lopez-Ben, Santiago
AU - Kingham, T. Peter
AU - Forchino, Fabio
AU - Ferrero, Alessandro
AU - Ettorre, Giuseppe Maria
AU - Levi Sandri, Giovanni Battista
AU - Pascual, Franco
AU - Cherqui, Daniel
AU - Soubrane, Olivier
AU - Wakabayashi, Go
AU - Troisi, Roberto I.
AU - Cheung, Tan To
AU - Chen, Zewei
AU - Yin, Mengqiu
AU - D’Silva, Mizelle
AU - Han, Ho Seong
AU - Nghia, Phan Phuoc
AU - Long, Tran Cong duy
AU - Edwin, Bjørn
AU - Fuks, David
AU - Chen, Kuo Hsin
AU - Abu Hilal, Mohammad
AU - Aldrighetti, Luca
AU - Goh, Brian K.P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Society of Surgical Oncology.
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - Introduction: Although tumor size (TS) is known to affect surgical outcomes in laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), its impact on laparoscopic major hepatectomy (L-MH) is not well studied. The objectives of this study were to investigate the impact of TS on the perioperative outcomes of L-MH and to elucidate the optimal TS cutoff for stratifying the difficulty of L-MH. Methods: This was a post-hoc analysis of 3008 patients who underwent L-MH at 48 international centers. A total 1396 patients met study criteria and were included. The impact of TS cutoffs was investigated by stratifying TS at each 10-mm interval. The optimal cutoffs were determined taking into consideration the number of endpoints which showed a statistically significant split around the cut-points of interest and the magnitude of relative risk after correction for multiple risk factors. Results: We identified 2 optimal TS cutoffs, 50 mm and 100 mm, which segregated L-MH into 3 groups. An increasing TS across these 3 groups (≤ 50 mm, 51–100 mm, > 100 mm), was significantly associated with a higher open conversion rate (11.2%, 14.7%, 23.0%, P < 0.001), longer operating time (median, 340 min, 346 min, 365 min, P = 0.025), increased blood loss (median, 300 ml, ml, 400 ml, P = 0.002) and higher rate of intraoperative blood transfusion (13.1%, 15.9%, 27.6%, P < 0.001). Postoperative outcomes such as overall morbidity, major morbidity, and length of stay were comparable across the three groups. Conclusion: Increasing TS was associated with poorer intraoperative but not postoperative outcomes after L-MH. We determined 2 TS cutoffs (50 mm and 10 mm) which could optimally stratify the surgical difficulty of L-MH.
AB - Introduction: Although tumor size (TS) is known to affect surgical outcomes in laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), its impact on laparoscopic major hepatectomy (L-MH) is not well studied. The objectives of this study were to investigate the impact of TS on the perioperative outcomes of L-MH and to elucidate the optimal TS cutoff for stratifying the difficulty of L-MH. Methods: This was a post-hoc analysis of 3008 patients who underwent L-MH at 48 international centers. A total 1396 patients met study criteria and were included. The impact of TS cutoffs was investigated by stratifying TS at each 10-mm interval. The optimal cutoffs were determined taking into consideration the number of endpoints which showed a statistically significant split around the cut-points of interest and the magnitude of relative risk after correction for multiple risk factors. Results: We identified 2 optimal TS cutoffs, 50 mm and 100 mm, which segregated L-MH into 3 groups. An increasing TS across these 3 groups (≤ 50 mm, 51–100 mm, > 100 mm), was significantly associated with a higher open conversion rate (11.2%, 14.7%, 23.0%, P < 0.001), longer operating time (median, 340 min, 346 min, 365 min, P = 0.025), increased blood loss (median, 300 ml, ml, 400 ml, P = 0.002) and higher rate of intraoperative blood transfusion (13.1%, 15.9%, 27.6%, P < 0.001). Postoperative outcomes such as overall morbidity, major morbidity, and length of stay were comparable across the three groups. Conclusion: Increasing TS was associated with poorer intraoperative but not postoperative outcomes after L-MH. We determined 2 TS cutoffs (50 mm and 10 mm) which could optimally stratify the surgical difficulty of L-MH.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166001782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85166001782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-023-13863-z
DO - 10.1245/s10434-023-13863-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 37505351
AN - SCOPUS:85166001782
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 30
SP - 6628
EP - 6636
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
IS - 11
ER -