抄録
Our meta-analysis demonstrated that intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)/bilateral-TBS (Bi-TBS) and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS)/bilateral-rTMS (Bi-rTMS) had similar efficacy, acceptability, and safety profiles for antidepressant treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (AD-TRD). In our sensitivity analysis that excluded a study that compared Bi-TBS with Bi-rTMS for older adults, all efficacy outcomes were also comparable between iTBS and HF-rTMS. Because iTBS does not require higher stimulation intensity and a longer stimulus time than conventional HF-rTMS protocols, we speculated that for those with AD-TRD, iTBS/Bi-TBS is a more helpful therapeutic modality in clinical practice than HF-rTMS/Bi-rTMS.
| 本文言語 | 英語 |
|---|---|
| ページ(範囲) | 115452-115452 |
| ページ数 | 1 |
| ジャーナル | Psychiatry Research |
| 巻 | 328 |
| DOI | |
| 出版ステータス | 出版済み - 28-08-2023 |
フィンガープリント
「Intermittent theta burst stimulation vs. high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。引用スタイル
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver