TY - JOUR
T1 - Laparoscopic Repeat Liver Resection—Selecting the Best Approach for Repeat Liver Resection
AU - Morise, Zenichi
AU - Katsuno, Hidetoshi
AU - Kikuchi, Kenji
AU - Endo, Tomoyoshi
AU - Matsuo, Kazuhiro
AU - Asano, Yukio
AU - Horiguchi, Akihiko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Recurrence of liver cancers after liver resection (LR), such as recurrences of hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastases, is often treated with repeat LR (RLR) as the only curative treatment. However, RLR is associated with an increased risk of complications. The indications for the currently emerging laparoscopic LR and its advantages and disadvantages for repeat treatment are still under discussion. Our multi-institutional propensity-score matched analyses of laparoscopic vs. open RLRs for hepatocellular carcinoma showed the feasibility of laparoscopic RLR with comparable short- and long-term outcomes. Small blood loss and low morbidity was observed in selected patients treated using laparoscopic RLR in which total adhesiolysis can be dodged, with speculations that laparoscopic minor repeated LR can minimize functional deterioration of the liver. However, there are several disadvantages, such as easily occurring disorientation and difficulty in repeated wide-range dissection of Glissonian pedicles. Recently emerging small anatomical resection, indocyanine green fluorescence-guided surgery, and robot-assisted surgery are promising tools for the further development of laparoscopic RLR. This review discusses how laparoscopic RLR, as a powerful unique local therapy causing less damage to the residual liver and surrounding structures, could contribute to the outcomes of repeated treatments for cancers and its future perspectives.
AB - Recurrence of liver cancers after liver resection (LR), such as recurrences of hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastases, is often treated with repeat LR (RLR) as the only curative treatment. However, RLR is associated with an increased risk of complications. The indications for the currently emerging laparoscopic LR and its advantages and disadvantages for repeat treatment are still under discussion. Our multi-institutional propensity-score matched analyses of laparoscopic vs. open RLRs for hepatocellular carcinoma showed the feasibility of laparoscopic RLR with comparable short- and long-term outcomes. Small blood loss and low morbidity was observed in selected patients treated using laparoscopic RLR in which total adhesiolysis can be dodged, with speculations that laparoscopic minor repeated LR can minimize functional deterioration of the liver. However, there are several disadvantages, such as easily occurring disorientation and difficulty in repeated wide-range dissection of Glissonian pedicles. Recently emerging small anatomical resection, indocyanine green fluorescence-guided surgery, and robot-assisted surgery are promising tools for the further development of laparoscopic RLR. This review discusses how laparoscopic RLR, as a powerful unique local therapy causing less damage to the residual liver and surrounding structures, could contribute to the outcomes of repeated treatments for cancers and its future perspectives.
KW - anatomical liver resection
KW - laparoscopic liver resection
KW - liver function
KW - navigation
KW - repeat liver resection
KW - robotic assisted liver resection
KW - short-term outcome
KW - simulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146576024&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85146576024&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/cancers15020421
DO - 10.3390/cancers15020421
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85146576024
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 15
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 2
M1 - 421
ER -