TY - JOUR
T1 - Multicenter proficiency benchmarks for advanced laparoscopic suturing tasks
AU - for the Simulation Committee of the Association for Surgical Education
AU - Bilgic, Elif
AU - Watanabe, Yusuke
AU - Nepomnayshy, Dmitry
AU - Gardner, Aimee
AU - Fitzgibbons, Shimae
AU - Ghaderi, Iman
AU - Alseidi, Adnan
AU - Stefanidis, Dimitrios
AU - Paige, John
AU - Seymour, Neal
AU - McKendy, Katherine M.
AU - Birkett, Richard
AU - Whitledge, James
AU - Kane, Erica
AU - Anton, Nicholas E.
AU - Vassiliou, Melina C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/2/1
Y1 - 2017/2/1
N2 - Background Advanced laparoscopic suturing (LS) tasks were developed based on a needs assessment. Initial validity evidence has been shown. The purpose of this multicenter study was to determine expert proficiency benchmarks for these tasks. Methods 6 tasks were included: needle handling (NH), offset-camera forehand suturing (OF), offset-camera backhand suturing (OB), confined space suturing (CF), suturing under tension (UT), and continuous suturing (CS). Minimally invasive surgeons experienced in LS completed the tasks twice. Mean time and median accuracy scores were used to establish the benchmarks. Results Seventeen MIS surgeons enrolled, from 7 academic centers. Mean (95% CI) time in seconds to complete each task was: NH 169 (149–189), OF 158 (134–181), OB 189 (154–224), CF 181 (156–205), UT 379 (334–423), and CS 416 (354–477). Very few errors in accuracy were made by experts in each of the tasks. Conclusions Time- and accuracy-based proficiency benchmarks for 6 advanced LS tasks were established. These benchmarks will be included in an advanced laparoscopic surgery curriculum currently under development.
AB - Background Advanced laparoscopic suturing (LS) tasks were developed based on a needs assessment. Initial validity evidence has been shown. The purpose of this multicenter study was to determine expert proficiency benchmarks for these tasks. Methods 6 tasks were included: needle handling (NH), offset-camera forehand suturing (OF), offset-camera backhand suturing (OB), confined space suturing (CF), suturing under tension (UT), and continuous suturing (CS). Minimally invasive surgeons experienced in LS completed the tasks twice. Mean time and median accuracy scores were used to establish the benchmarks. Results Seventeen MIS surgeons enrolled, from 7 academic centers. Mean (95% CI) time in seconds to complete each task was: NH 169 (149–189), OF 158 (134–181), OB 189 (154–224), CF 181 (156–205), UT 379 (334–423), and CS 416 (354–477). Very few errors in accuracy were made by experts in each of the tasks. Conclusions Time- and accuracy-based proficiency benchmarks for 6 advanced LS tasks were established. These benchmarks will be included in an advanced laparoscopic surgery curriculum currently under development.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006084773&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006084773&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.033
DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.033
M3 - Article
C2 - 27776755
AN - SCOPUS:85006084773
SN - 0002-9610
VL - 213
SP - 217
EP - 221
JO - American Journal of Surgery
JF - American Journal of Surgery
IS - 2
ER -