TY - JOUR
T1 - Neuroethics Questions to Guide Ethical Research in the International Brain Initiatives
AU - Global Neuroethics Summit Delegates
AU - Amadio, Jordan
AU - Bi, Guo Qiang
AU - Boshears, Paul Frederick
AU - Carter, Adrian
AU - Devor, Anna
AU - Doya, Kenji
AU - Garden, Hermann
AU - Illes, Judy
AU - Johnson, L. Syd M.
AU - Jorgenson, Lyric
AU - Jun, Bang Ook
AU - Lee, Inyoung
AU - Michie, Patricia
AU - Miyakawa, Tsuyoshi
AU - Nakazawa, Eisuke
AU - Sakura, Osamu
AU - Sarkissian, Hagop
AU - Sullivan, Laura Specker
AU - Uh, Stepheni
AU - Winickoff, David
AU - Wolpe, Paul Root
AU - Wu, Kevin Chien Chang
AU - Yasamura, Akira
AU - Zheng, Jialin C.
AU - Rommelfanger, Karen S.
AU - Jeong, Sung Jin
AU - Ema, Arisa
AU - Fukushi, Tamami
AU - Kasai, Kiyoto
AU - Ramos, Khara M.
AU - Salles, Arleen
AU - Singh, Ilina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2018/10/10
Y1 - 2018/10/10
N2 - Increasingly, national governments across the globe are prioritizing investments in neuroscience. Currently, seven active or in-development national-level brain research initiatives exist, spanning four continents. Engaging with the underlying values and ethical concerns that drive brain research across cultural and continental divides is critical to future research. Culture influences what kinds of science are supported and where science can be conducted through ethical frameworks and evaluations of risk. Neuroscientists and philosophers alike have found themselves together encountering perennial questions; these questions are engaged by the field of neuroethics, related to the nature of understanding the self and identity, the existence and meaning of free will, defining the role of reason in human behavior, and more. With this Perspective article, we aim to prioritize and advance to the foreground a list of neuroethics questions for neuroscientists operating in the context of these international brain initiatives. Neuroscience is a national priority across the globe necessitating engagement with the underlying cultural and ethical values that drive brain research. We offer a list of neuroethics questions for neuroscientists to advance and accelerate an ethically tenable globalized neuroscience.
AB - Increasingly, national governments across the globe are prioritizing investments in neuroscience. Currently, seven active or in-development national-level brain research initiatives exist, spanning four continents. Engaging with the underlying values and ethical concerns that drive brain research across cultural and continental divides is critical to future research. Culture influences what kinds of science are supported and where science can be conducted through ethical frameworks and evaluations of risk. Neuroscientists and philosophers alike have found themselves together encountering perennial questions; these questions are engaged by the field of neuroethics, related to the nature of understanding the self and identity, the existence and meaning of free will, defining the role of reason in human behavior, and more. With this Perspective article, we aim to prioritize and advance to the foreground a list of neuroethics questions for neuroscientists operating in the context of these international brain initiatives. Neuroscience is a national priority across the globe necessitating engagement with the underlying cultural and ethical values that drive brain research. We offer a list of neuroethics questions for neuroscientists to advance and accelerate an ethically tenable globalized neuroscience.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054531214&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054531214&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.021
DO - 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.021
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30308169
AN - SCOPUS:85054531214
SN - 0896-6273
VL - 100
SP - 19
EP - 36
JO - Neuron
JF - Neuron
IS - 1
ER -