TY - JOUR
T1 - Non-traumatic hemorrhage is controlled with REBOA in acute phase then mortality increases gradually by non-hemorrhagic causes
T2 - DIRECT-IABO registry in Japan
AU - DIRECT-IABO investigators
AU - Matsumura, Y.
AU - Matsumoto, J.
AU - Idoguchi, K.
AU - Kondo, H.
AU - Ishida, T.
AU - Kon, Y.
AU - Tomita, K.
AU - Ishida, K.
AU - Hirose, T.
AU - Umakoshi, K.
AU - Funabiki, T.
AU - Hagawa, Naohiro
AU - Ishida, Tokiya
AU - Ishida, Kenichiro
AU - Yamamura, Eiji
AU - Umakoshi, Kensuke
AU - Yamada, Kosuke Chiris
AU - Homma, Yosuke
AU - Hirose, Tomoya
AU - Fujii, Mahiro
AU - Ito, Chikao
AU - Yamamoto, Takahiro
AU - Orita, Tomohiko
AU - Matsumoto, Junichi
AU - Idoguchi, Koji
AU - Kon, Yuri
AU - Tomita, Keisuke
AU - Shinjo, Takafumi
AU - Toyoda, Yukitoshi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.
PY - 2018/8/1
Y1 - 2018/8/1
N2 - Purpose: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is now a feasible and less invasive resuscitation procedure. This study aimed to compare the clinical course of trauma and non-trauma patients undergoing REBOA. Methods: Patient demographics, etiology, bleeding sites, hemodynamic response, length of critical care, and cause of death were recorded. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between non-trauma and trauma patients. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was then conducted. Results: Between August 2011 and December 2015, 142 (36 non-trauma; 106 trauma) cases were analyzed. Non-traumatic etiologies included gastrointestinal bleeding, obstetrics and gynecology-derived events, visceral aneurysm, abdominal aortic aneurysm, and post-abdominal surgery. The abdomen was a common bleeding site (69%), followed by the pelvis or extra-pelvic retroperitoneum. None of the non-trauma patients had multiple bleeding sites, whereas 45% of trauma patients did (P < 0.001). No non-trauma patients required resuscitative thoracotomy compared with 28% of the trauma patients (P < 0.001). Non-trauma patients presented a lower 24-h mortality than trauma patients (19 vs. 51%, P = 0.001). The non-trauma cases demonstrated a gradual but prolonged increased mortality, whereas survival in trauma cases rapidly declined (P = 0.009) with similar hospital mortality (68 vs. 64%). Non-trauma patients who survived for 24 h had 0 ventilator-free days and 0 ICU-free days vs. a median of 19 and 12, respectively, for trauma patients (P = 0.33 and 0.39, respectively). Non-hemorrhagic death was more common in non-trauma vs. trauma patients (83 vs. 33%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Non-traumatic hemorrhagic shock often resulted from a single bleeding site, and resulted in better 24-h survival than traumatic hemorrhage among Japanese patients who underwent REBOA. However, hospital mortality increased steadily in non-trauma patients affected by non-hemorrhagic causes after a longer period of critical care.
AB - Purpose: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is now a feasible and less invasive resuscitation procedure. This study aimed to compare the clinical course of trauma and non-trauma patients undergoing REBOA. Methods: Patient demographics, etiology, bleeding sites, hemodynamic response, length of critical care, and cause of death were recorded. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between non-trauma and trauma patients. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was then conducted. Results: Between August 2011 and December 2015, 142 (36 non-trauma; 106 trauma) cases were analyzed. Non-traumatic etiologies included gastrointestinal bleeding, obstetrics and gynecology-derived events, visceral aneurysm, abdominal aortic aneurysm, and post-abdominal surgery. The abdomen was a common bleeding site (69%), followed by the pelvis or extra-pelvic retroperitoneum. None of the non-trauma patients had multiple bleeding sites, whereas 45% of trauma patients did (P < 0.001). No non-trauma patients required resuscitative thoracotomy compared with 28% of the trauma patients (P < 0.001). Non-trauma patients presented a lower 24-h mortality than trauma patients (19 vs. 51%, P = 0.001). The non-trauma cases demonstrated a gradual but prolonged increased mortality, whereas survival in trauma cases rapidly declined (P = 0.009) with similar hospital mortality (68 vs. 64%). Non-trauma patients who survived for 24 h had 0 ventilator-free days and 0 ICU-free days vs. a median of 19 and 12, respectively, for trauma patients (P = 0.33 and 0.39, respectively). Non-hemorrhagic death was more common in non-trauma vs. trauma patients (83 vs. 33%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Non-traumatic hemorrhagic shock often resulted from a single bleeding site, and resulted in better 24-h survival than traumatic hemorrhage among Japanese patients who underwent REBOA. However, hospital mortality increased steadily in non-trauma patients affected by non-hemorrhagic causes after a longer period of critical care.
KW - Critical care
KW - Hemorrhagic shock
KW - Non-trauma
KW - Resuscitative endovascular occlusion of the aorta (REBOA)
KW - Trauma
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85027831538
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85027831538#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1007/s00068-017-0829-z
DO - 10.1007/s00068-017-0829-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 28831501
AN - SCOPUS:85027831538
SN - 1863-9933
VL - 44
SP - 503
EP - 509
JO - European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
JF - European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
IS - 4
ER -