TY - CHAP
T1 - Perspectives on home hemodialysis in Japan
AU - Maeda, Kenji
AU - Nakai, Shigeru
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Home hemodialysis (HHD) started in Japan in 1969. It has been done in the largest number of patients with the purpose of better social reintegration, followed by patients for whom commuting to a hospital is geographically difficult. In a subanalysis of the JSDT patient registry, the survival rate at 9 years for male patients excluding those with diabetes was significantly better in HHD patients than in facility dialysis patients. This result was thought to indicate that HHD was superior treatment both medically and socially, but it has not increased greatly because of conditions that impede the implementation of HHD, such as finding a caregiver and the burden on the caregiver, as well as the burden of light, heat, and water costs. However, long-duration dialysis and frequent dialysis are done even in general dialysis treatment, and the number of HHD patients has increased recently because of some improvement in health insurance payments for HHD in 1998. The spread of HHD is essential also in the broad implementation of diversifying HD modalities, and maintaining an accurate registry of HHD patients, analyzing factors that affect survival rates with each modality, clarifying conditions for adequacy of dialysis, and clarifying which treatments are superior are important future issues for dialysis treatment.
AB - Home hemodialysis (HHD) started in Japan in 1969. It has been done in the largest number of patients with the purpose of better social reintegration, followed by patients for whom commuting to a hospital is geographically difficult. In a subanalysis of the JSDT patient registry, the survival rate at 9 years for male patients excluding those with diabetes was significantly better in HHD patients than in facility dialysis patients. This result was thought to indicate that HHD was superior treatment both medically and socially, but it has not increased greatly because of conditions that impede the implementation of HHD, such as finding a caregiver and the burden on the caregiver, as well as the burden of light, heat, and water costs. However, long-duration dialysis and frequent dialysis are done even in general dialysis treatment, and the number of HHD patients has increased recently because of some improvement in health insurance payments for HHD in 1998. The spread of HHD is essential also in the broad implementation of diversifying HD modalities, and maintaining an accurate registry of HHD patients, analyzing factors that affect survival rates with each modality, clarifying conditions for adequacy of dialysis, and clarifying which treatments are superior are important future issues for dialysis treatment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861434876&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861434876&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000336942
DO - 10.1159/000336942
M3 - Chapter
C2 - 22613920
AN - SCOPUS:84861434876
SN - 9783318021097
T3 - Contributions to Nephrology
SP - 99
EP - 105
BT - Home Dialysis in Japan
PB - S. Karger AG
ER -