TY - JOUR
T1 - Preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening by comprehensive molecular testing
AU - Kurahashi, Hiroki
AU - Kato, Takema
AU - Miyazaki, Jun
AU - Nishizawa, Haruki
AU - Nishio, Eiji
AU - Furukawa, Hiroshi
AU - Miyamura, Hironori
AU - Ito, Mayuko
AU - Endo, Toshiaki
AU - Ouchi, Yuya
AU - Inagaki, Hidehito
AU - Fujii, Takuma
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine.
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - Although embryo screening by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has become the standard technique for the treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss in couples with a balanced gross chromosomal rearrangement, the implantation and pregnancy rates of PGD using conventional fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) remain suboptimal. Comprehensive molecular testing, such as array comparative genomic hybridization and next-generation sequencing, can improve these rates, but amplification bias in the whole genome amplification method remains an obstacle to accurate diagnosis. Recent advances in amplification procedures combined with improvements in the microarray platform and analytical method have overcome the amplification bias, and the data accuracy of the comprehensive PGD method has reached the level of clinical laboratory testing. Currently, comprehensive PGD is also applied to recurrent pregnancy loss due to recurrent fetal aneuploidy or infertility with recurrent implantation failure, known as preimplantation genetic screening. However, there are still numerous problems to be solved, including misdiagnosis due to somatic mosaicism, cell cycle-related background noise, and difficulty in diagnosis of polyploidy. The technology for comprehensive PGD also requires further improvement.
AB - Although embryo screening by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has become the standard technique for the treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss in couples with a balanced gross chromosomal rearrangement, the implantation and pregnancy rates of PGD using conventional fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) remain suboptimal. Comprehensive molecular testing, such as array comparative genomic hybridization and next-generation sequencing, can improve these rates, but amplification bias in the whole genome amplification method remains an obstacle to accurate diagnosis. Recent advances in amplification procedures combined with improvements in the microarray platform and analytical method have overcome the amplification bias, and the data accuracy of the comprehensive PGD method has reached the level of clinical laboratory testing. Currently, comprehensive PGD is also applied to recurrent pregnancy loss due to recurrent fetal aneuploidy or infertility with recurrent implantation failure, known as preimplantation genetic screening. However, there are still numerous problems to be solved, including misdiagnosis due to somatic mosaicism, cell cycle-related background noise, and difficulty in diagnosis of polyploidy. The technology for comprehensive PGD also requires further improvement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84950302256&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84950302256&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12522-015-0216-6
DO - 10.1007/s12522-015-0216-6
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84950302256
SN - 1445-5781
VL - 15
SP - 13
EP - 19
JO - Reproductive Medicine and Biology
JF - Reproductive Medicine and Biology
IS - 1
ER -