抄録
Background: Ciprofloxacin (CPFX) is a potential alternative in patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) because of its activity against Gram-negative organisms. We conducted a non-inferiority, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing intravenous CPFX and cefepime (CFPM) for FN patients with hematological malignancies. Methods: Patients aged from 15 to 79 years with an absolute neutrophil count of <0.500×109/l were eligible, and were randomized to receive 300mg of CPFX or 2g of CFPM every 12h. Initial treatment efficacy, overall response, and early toxicity were evaluated. Results: Fifty-one episodes were included in this trial, and 49 episodes (CPFX vs. CFPM: 24 vs. 25) were evaluated. Treatment efficacy at day 7 was significantly higher in the CFPM group (successful clinical response: nine with CPFX and 19 with CFPM; p=0.007). The response was better in high-risk patients with neutrophil counts of ≤0.100×109/l (p=0.003). The overall response during the study period was similar between the CPFX and CFPM groups (p=0.64). Adverse events were minimal, and all patients could continue the treatment. Conclusions: We could not prove the non-inferiority of CPFX in comparison with CFPM for the initial treatment of FN. CFPM remains the standard treatment of choice for FN.
| 本文言語 | 英語 |
|---|---|
| ページ(範囲) | e385-e390 |
| ジャーナル | International Journal of Infectious Diseases |
| 巻 | 17 |
| 号 | 6 |
| DOI | |
| 出版ステータス | 出版済み - 06-2013 |
| 外部発表 | はい |
UN SDG
この成果は、次の持続可能な開発目標に貢献しています
-
SDG 3 すべての人に健康と福祉を
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- 微生物学(医療)
- 感染症
フィンガープリント
「Randomized controlled trial comparing ciprofloxacin and cefepime in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。引用スタイル
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver