TY - JOUR
T1 - Selecting optimal immunotherapy based on inflammation in stage IV PD-L1 ≥50% gene mutation-negative non-small cell lung cancer
T2 - pembrolizumab monotherapy versus combination chemoimmunotherapy
AU - Kunimatsu, Yusuke
AU - Nishioka, Naoya
AU - Yamada, Tadaaki
AU - Kawachi, Hayato
AU - Tamiya, Motohiro
AU - Negi, Yoshiki
AU - Goto, Yasuhiro
AU - Nakao, Akira
AU - Shiotsu, Shinsuke
AU - Tanimura, Keiko
AU - Takeda, Takayuki
AU - Okada, Asuka
AU - Harada, Taishi
AU - Date, Koji
AU - Chihara, Yusuke
AU - Hasegawa, Isao
AU - Tamiya, Nobuyo
AU - Ishida, Masaki
AU - Kijima, Takashi
AU - Takayama, Koichi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© AME Publishing Company.
PY - 2025/11/30
Y1 - 2025/11/30
N2 - Background: Systemic inflammation may reduce the efficacy of immunotherapy. For advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50% and without driver gene mutations, both immunotherapy monotherapy and combination chemoimmunotherapy are considered standard treatment options; however, it remains unclear which treatment is more appropriate depending on the degree of inflammation. This study investigated the impact of inflammation on the effectiveness of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus combination chemoimmunotherapy. Methods: In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, we included patients with advanced NSCLC from 13 Japanese institutions who received pembrolizumab monotherapy or combination chemoimmunotherapy as first-line treatment between March 2017 and October 2021. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) was used as an inflammation marker, with a cutoff value of 1,444 based on previous data. Patients were classified into high (SII ≥1,444) and low (SII <1,444) inflammation groups. Results: This study included 347 patients with advanced NSCLC: 212 (61.1%) in the pembrolizumab group and 135 (38.9%) in the combination chemoimmunotherapy group. In the high inflammation population, there were no significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the pembrolizumab and combination chemoimmunotherapy groups. In the low inflammation population, PFS and OS were significantly improved in the combination chemoimmunotherapy group compared to the pembrolizumab group [median PFS: 8.8 vs. 16.0 months, hazard ratio (HR) =0.69, P=0.04; median OS: 29.4 vs. not reached (NR), HR =0.55, P=0.007]. Conclusions: In patients with advanced, driver gene mutation-negative NSCLC, high PD-L1 expression (≥50%), and low systemic inflammation, combination chemoimmunotherapy significantly improved PFS and OS compared to pembrolizumab monotherapy.
AB - Background: Systemic inflammation may reduce the efficacy of immunotherapy. For advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50% and without driver gene mutations, both immunotherapy monotherapy and combination chemoimmunotherapy are considered standard treatment options; however, it remains unclear which treatment is more appropriate depending on the degree of inflammation. This study investigated the impact of inflammation on the effectiveness of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus combination chemoimmunotherapy. Methods: In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, we included patients with advanced NSCLC from 13 Japanese institutions who received pembrolizumab monotherapy or combination chemoimmunotherapy as first-line treatment between March 2017 and October 2021. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) was used as an inflammation marker, with a cutoff value of 1,444 based on previous data. Patients were classified into high (SII ≥1,444) and low (SII <1,444) inflammation groups. Results: This study included 347 patients with advanced NSCLC: 212 (61.1%) in the pembrolizumab group and 135 (38.9%) in the combination chemoimmunotherapy group. In the high inflammation population, there were no significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the pembrolizumab and combination chemoimmunotherapy groups. In the low inflammation population, PFS and OS were significantly improved in the combination chemoimmunotherapy group compared to the pembrolizumab group [median PFS: 8.8 vs. 16.0 months, hazard ratio (HR) =0.69, P=0.04; median OS: 29.4 vs. not reached (NR), HR =0.55, P=0.007]. Conclusions: In patients with advanced, driver gene mutation-negative NSCLC, high PD-L1 expression (≥50%), and low systemic inflammation, combination chemoimmunotherapy significantly improved PFS and OS compared to pembrolizumab monotherapy.
KW - Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
KW - immunotherapy
KW - inflammatory index
KW - programmed death-ligand 1 expression (PDL1 expression)
KW - systemic immune-inflammation index (SII)
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105022912392
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105022912392#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.21037/tlcr-2025-873
DO - 10.21037/tlcr-2025-873
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105022912392
SN - 2218-6751
VL - 14
SP - 4733
EP - 4745
JO - Translational Lung Cancer Research
JF - Translational Lung Cancer Research
IS - 11
ER -