Simple swallowing provocation test has limited applicability as a screening tool for detecting aspiration, silent aspiration, or penetration

Hitoshi Kagaya, Sumiko Okada, Eiichi Saitoh, Mikoto Baba, Michio Yokoyama, Hitomi Takahashi

研究成果: Article

9 引用 (Scopus)

抄録

A number of tests for evaluating dysphagia without using videofluoroscopic examination of swallowing (VF) or videoendoscopic evaluation of swallowing (VE)have been developed. The simple swallowing provocation test (SSPT) is unique because it is performed while in a supine position and does not require the patient's cooperation. However, whether the SSPT detects aspiration or penetration correctly is unclear because its validity determined by VF or VE has not been evaluated. Therefore, we determined the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy of SSPT followed by VF in 45 patients. The sensitivities of the first-step and the second-step SSPT for the detection of aspiration, silent aspiration, or penetration were 72-75% and 13-17%, respectively; the specificities of the first-step and the second-step SSPT were 38-44% and 80-89%, respectively; and the predictive accuracies of the first-step and the second-step SSPT were 58-67% and 31-49%, respectively. These data suggest that SSPT has limited applicability as a screening tool for aspiration, silent aspiration, or penetration because of its low sensitivity. This test may be useful for patients who cannot undergo other tests due to cognitive and/ or linguistic dysfunction.

元の言語English
ページ(範囲)6-10
ページ数5
ジャーナルDysphagia
25
発行部数1
DOI
出版物ステータスPublished - 01-03-2010

Fingerprint

Deglutition
Aspirations (Psychology)
Supine Position
Linguistics
Patient Compliance
Deglutition Disorders
Sensitivity and Specificity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Speech and Hearing

これを引用

@article{d41ac3af9e0349c9acd5bc62328ebf06,
title = "Simple swallowing provocation test has limited applicability as a screening tool for detecting aspiration, silent aspiration, or penetration",
abstract = "A number of tests for evaluating dysphagia without using videofluoroscopic examination of swallowing (VF) or videoendoscopic evaluation of swallowing (VE)have been developed. The simple swallowing provocation test (SSPT) is unique because it is performed while in a supine position and does not require the patient's cooperation. However, whether the SSPT detects aspiration or penetration correctly is unclear because its validity determined by VF or VE has not been evaluated. Therefore, we determined the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy of SSPT followed by VF in 45 patients. The sensitivities of the first-step and the second-step SSPT for the detection of aspiration, silent aspiration, or penetration were 72-75{\%} and 13-17{\%}, respectively; the specificities of the first-step and the second-step SSPT were 38-44{\%} and 80-89{\%}, respectively; and the predictive accuracies of the first-step and the second-step SSPT were 58-67{\%} and 31-49{\%}, respectively. These data suggest that SSPT has limited applicability as a screening tool for aspiration, silent aspiration, or penetration because of its low sensitivity. This test may be useful for patients who cannot undergo other tests due to cognitive and/ or linguistic dysfunction.",
author = "Hitoshi Kagaya and Sumiko Okada and Eiichi Saitoh and Mikoto Baba and Michio Yokoyama and Hitomi Takahashi",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00455-009-9222-3",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "6--10",
journal = "Dysphagia",
issn = "0179-051X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

Simple swallowing provocation test has limited applicability as a screening tool for detecting aspiration, silent aspiration, or penetration. / Kagaya, Hitoshi; Okada, Sumiko; Saitoh, Eiichi; Baba, Mikoto; Yokoyama, Michio; Takahashi, Hitomi.

:: Dysphagia, 巻 25, 番号 1, 01.03.2010, p. 6-10.

研究成果: Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simple swallowing provocation test has limited applicability as a screening tool for detecting aspiration, silent aspiration, or penetration

AU - Kagaya, Hitoshi

AU - Okada, Sumiko

AU - Saitoh, Eiichi

AU - Baba, Mikoto

AU - Yokoyama, Michio

AU - Takahashi, Hitomi

PY - 2010/3/1

Y1 - 2010/3/1

N2 - A number of tests for evaluating dysphagia without using videofluoroscopic examination of swallowing (VF) or videoendoscopic evaluation of swallowing (VE)have been developed. The simple swallowing provocation test (SSPT) is unique because it is performed while in a supine position and does not require the patient's cooperation. However, whether the SSPT detects aspiration or penetration correctly is unclear because its validity determined by VF or VE has not been evaluated. Therefore, we determined the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy of SSPT followed by VF in 45 patients. The sensitivities of the first-step and the second-step SSPT for the detection of aspiration, silent aspiration, or penetration were 72-75% and 13-17%, respectively; the specificities of the first-step and the second-step SSPT were 38-44% and 80-89%, respectively; and the predictive accuracies of the first-step and the second-step SSPT were 58-67% and 31-49%, respectively. These data suggest that SSPT has limited applicability as a screening tool for aspiration, silent aspiration, or penetration because of its low sensitivity. This test may be useful for patients who cannot undergo other tests due to cognitive and/ or linguistic dysfunction.

AB - A number of tests for evaluating dysphagia without using videofluoroscopic examination of swallowing (VF) or videoendoscopic evaluation of swallowing (VE)have been developed. The simple swallowing provocation test (SSPT) is unique because it is performed while in a supine position and does not require the patient's cooperation. However, whether the SSPT detects aspiration or penetration correctly is unclear because its validity determined by VF or VE has not been evaluated. Therefore, we determined the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy of SSPT followed by VF in 45 patients. The sensitivities of the first-step and the second-step SSPT for the detection of aspiration, silent aspiration, or penetration were 72-75% and 13-17%, respectively; the specificities of the first-step and the second-step SSPT were 38-44% and 80-89%, respectively; and the predictive accuracies of the first-step and the second-step SSPT were 58-67% and 31-49%, respectively. These data suggest that SSPT has limited applicability as a screening tool for aspiration, silent aspiration, or penetration because of its low sensitivity. This test may be useful for patients who cannot undergo other tests due to cognitive and/ or linguistic dysfunction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953292087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953292087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00455-009-9222-3

DO - 10.1007/s00455-009-9222-3

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 6

EP - 10

JO - Dysphagia

JF - Dysphagia

SN - 0179-051X

IS - 1

ER -