TY - JOUR
T1 - Simulated medical information system
T2 - education for aspiring healthcare information technologists
AU - Muto, Koichi
AU - Koyama, Soichiro
AU - Tanabe, Shigeo
AU - Sakurai, Hiroaki
AU - Kanada, Yoshikiyo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Koichi Muto, MS et al.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Objectives: To determine if a simulated medical information system can improve the level of understanding of healthcare information technology students. Methods: The study involved 40 healthcare information technology students. All the students took the healthcare information technology course using the simulated medical information system. The primary outcome was a measure of their level of understanding assessed with a questionnaire using a five-point Likert-type scale. The questions were all included in the required knowledge for the Specific Behavioral Objectives for Healthcare Information Technologists (2016) and Senior Healthcare Information Technologists (ver. 1.1, 2017). To measure the level of understanding, median with 10th–90th percentile CI values for both sets of questionnaires were calculated for all the students. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare level of understanding before and after the training. Results: Some students were excluded because they failed to complete the questionnaires. For both Healthcare Information Technologists (n=37) and Senior Health Information Technologists (n=34), the level of understanding was significantly different before (median [10th–90th percentile]: 1175 [935–1271], 416 [302–513]) and after (1200 [1016–1472], 469.5 [351–527]) the training (p<0.05). Conclusions: A simulated medical information system may be an effective tool for students to learn about healthcare information technology.
AB - Objectives: To determine if a simulated medical information system can improve the level of understanding of healthcare information technology students. Methods: The study involved 40 healthcare information technology students. All the students took the healthcare information technology course using the simulated medical information system. The primary outcome was a measure of their level of understanding assessed with a questionnaire using a five-point Likert-type scale. The questions were all included in the required knowledge for the Specific Behavioral Objectives for Healthcare Information Technologists (2016) and Senior Healthcare Information Technologists (ver. 1.1, 2017). To measure the level of understanding, median with 10th–90th percentile CI values for both sets of questionnaires were calculated for all the students. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare level of understanding before and after the training. Results: Some students were excluded because they failed to complete the questionnaires. For both Healthcare Information Technologists (n=37) and Senior Health Information Technologists (n=34), the level of understanding was significantly different before (median [10th–90th percentile]: 1175 [935–1271], 416 [302–513]) and after (1200 [1016–1472], 469.5 [351–527]) the training (p<0.05). Conclusions: A simulated medical information system may be an effective tool for students to learn about healthcare information technology.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173966797&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85173966797&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.20407/fmj.2021-022
DO - 10.20407/fmj.2021-022
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85173966797
SN - 2189-7247
VL - 9
SP - 12
EP - 16
JO - Fujita Medical Journal
JF - Fujita Medical Journal
IS - 1
ER -