TY - JOUR
T1 - Systemic therapy sequence and outcomes in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
T2 - results from the multicenter Tokai Post ICI Sequential Therapy Registry cohort
AU - Tsukimoto, Mone
AU - Fujiwara, Naoto
AU - Ito, Takanori
AU - Imai, Kenji
AU - Ariga, Mizuki
AU - Suzuki, Takaya
AU - Yamamoto, Takafumi
AU - Kawachi, Mizuki
AU - Yoshida, Yuki
AU - Owa, Hirono
AU - Tamai, Yasuyuki
AU - Shigefuku, Ryuta
AU - Tameda, Masahiko
AU - Ogura, Suguru
AU - Tanaka, Hideaki
AU - Igura, Kazumasa
AU - Imai, Yasuhito
AU - Takai, Koji
AU - Shimizu, Masahito
AU - Honda, Takashi
AU - Kawashima, Hiroki
AU - Kuzuya, Teiji
AU - Nakagawa, Hayato
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2026 Wolters Kluwer Health, LLC. All rights reserved.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Aim – To clarify the optimal sequencing strategy of systemic therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma that maximizes efficacy and patient outcomes. Methods – We established a multicenter retrospective Tokai Post ICI Sequential Therapy Registry cohort across four Tertiary-Care Hospitals in Japan, enrolling patients who received first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy between October 2020 and May 2025. Tumor response was assessed every 2–3 months by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version1.1 as the primary outcome. Logistic regression models evaluated predictors of response with hospital-level mixed effects. Results – A total of 368 patients were included [median age 74 years (interquartile range: 68–80 years); 303 (82%) male]; 307 (83.4%) received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and 61 (16.6%) durvalumab plus tremelimumab. Following discontinuation, 151 (47.0%) proceeded to second-line therapy, predominantly lenvatinib (n = 124, 82%). Second-line lenvatinib achieved objective response rates of 12–25% and disease control rates (DCRs) exceeding 60%, independent of prior ICI regimen or response. Of 56 patients receiving third-line therapy, the sequences of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab–lenvatinib–durvalumab plus tremelimumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab–lenvatinib–atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (n = 19, 28.6%) demonstrated significantly higher DCR compared with other sequences (52.6 vs. 29.7%) despite comparable liver function reserve and tumor burden. In addition, durvalumab plus tremelimumab following atezolizumab plus bevacizumab–lenvatinib showed numerically higher DCR compared with durvalumab plus tremelimumab directly after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (53.3 vs. 29.4%). Conclusion – Consistent efficacy of second-line lenvatinib and favorable outcomes with ICI–lenvatinib–ICI sequences may underscore the clinical importance of therapy sequencing in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, warranting prospective evaluation of optimal strategies.
AB - Aim – To clarify the optimal sequencing strategy of systemic therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma that maximizes efficacy and patient outcomes. Methods – We established a multicenter retrospective Tokai Post ICI Sequential Therapy Registry cohort across four Tertiary-Care Hospitals in Japan, enrolling patients who received first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy between October 2020 and May 2025. Tumor response was assessed every 2–3 months by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version1.1 as the primary outcome. Logistic regression models evaluated predictors of response with hospital-level mixed effects. Results – A total of 368 patients were included [median age 74 years (interquartile range: 68–80 years); 303 (82%) male]; 307 (83.4%) received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and 61 (16.6%) durvalumab plus tremelimumab. Following discontinuation, 151 (47.0%) proceeded to second-line therapy, predominantly lenvatinib (n = 124, 82%). Second-line lenvatinib achieved objective response rates of 12–25% and disease control rates (DCRs) exceeding 60%, independent of prior ICI regimen or response. Of 56 patients receiving third-line therapy, the sequences of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab–lenvatinib–durvalumab plus tremelimumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab–lenvatinib–atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (n = 19, 28.6%) demonstrated significantly higher DCR compared with other sequences (52.6 vs. 29.7%) despite comparable liver function reserve and tumor burden. In addition, durvalumab plus tremelimumab following atezolizumab plus bevacizumab–lenvatinib showed numerically higher DCR compared with durvalumab plus tremelimumab directly after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (53.3 vs. 29.4%). Conclusion – Consistent efficacy of second-line lenvatinib and favorable outcomes with ICI–lenvatinib–ICI sequences may underscore the clinical importance of therapy sequencing in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, warranting prospective evaluation of optimal strategies.
KW - hepatocellular carcinoma
KW - immune checkpoint inhibitor
KW - molecular-targeted agent
KW - therapy sequence
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105045952699
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105045952699#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1097/MEG.0000000000003256
DO - 10.1097/MEG.0000000000003256
M3 - Article
C2 - 42485143
AN - SCOPUS:105045952699
SN - 0954-691X
JO - European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
JF - European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ER -