TY - JOUR
T1 - Three-dimensional airway lumen volumetry
T2 - Comparison with bronchial wall area and parenchymal densitometry in assessment of airway obstruction in pulmonary emphysema
AU - Koyama, Hisanobu
AU - Ohno, Y.
AU - Nishio, M.
AU - Takenaka, D.
AU - Yoshikawa, T.
AU - Matsumoto, S.
AU - Nishimura, Y.
AU - Sugimura, K.
PY - 2012/12
Y1 - 2012/12
N2 - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare three-dimensional airway lumen volumetry with bronchial wall area and parenchymal densitometry in the assessment of airway obstruction in pulmonary emphysema. Methods: 56 patients, who were smokers, underwent CT examination and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). For quantitative assessments, the following parameters were computationally calculated: (1) percentage of voxels 2950, 2960 and -970 HU in the lung (%LAA-950, %LAA-960 and %LAA-970, respectively); (2) percentage of partial bronchi luminal volumes per total luminal volumes (LVmain, main and distal bronchial volume/total luminal volume; LVlobe, lobar and distal bronchial volume/total luminal volume); and (3) mean wall area percentages of segmental bronchi of the right apical and left apicoposterior segment (WA%seg) and of subsegmental bronchi (WA%sub) in the upper lobes. These parameters were correlated with PFTs and statistically compared between a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) group [forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC)<70] and a non-COPD group. Results: FEV1, maximum mid-expiratory flow rate and forced expiratory flow at 25% vital capacity had significant correlation with LVmain (r>0.53, p<0.0001), LVlobe (r>0.52, p<0.0001), WA%seg (|r|>0.29, p<0.05) and WA%sub (|r|>0.31, p<0.05). FEV1/FVC had significant correlation with all parameters (0.27,|r|<0.52, p<0.05). LVmain and LVlobe and WA%seg and WA% sub were significantly different between the two groups (LV main and LVlobe; p<0.0001, WA%seg and WA%sub; p<0.05). Conclusions: Bronchial luminal volumetric assessment better reflected the airflow limitation parameters. Advances in knowledge: Bronchial luminal volumetric assessment can potentially be used to gauge airflow limitation in pulmonary emphysema.
AB - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare three-dimensional airway lumen volumetry with bronchial wall area and parenchymal densitometry in the assessment of airway obstruction in pulmonary emphysema. Methods: 56 patients, who were smokers, underwent CT examination and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). For quantitative assessments, the following parameters were computationally calculated: (1) percentage of voxels 2950, 2960 and -970 HU in the lung (%LAA-950, %LAA-960 and %LAA-970, respectively); (2) percentage of partial bronchi luminal volumes per total luminal volumes (LVmain, main and distal bronchial volume/total luminal volume; LVlobe, lobar and distal bronchial volume/total luminal volume); and (3) mean wall area percentages of segmental bronchi of the right apical and left apicoposterior segment (WA%seg) and of subsegmental bronchi (WA%sub) in the upper lobes. These parameters were correlated with PFTs and statistically compared between a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) group [forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC)<70] and a non-COPD group. Results: FEV1, maximum mid-expiratory flow rate and forced expiratory flow at 25% vital capacity had significant correlation with LVmain (r>0.53, p<0.0001), LVlobe (r>0.52, p<0.0001), WA%seg (|r|>0.29, p<0.05) and WA%sub (|r|>0.31, p<0.05). FEV1/FVC had significant correlation with all parameters (0.27,|r|<0.52, p<0.05). LVmain and LVlobe and WA%seg and WA% sub were significantly different between the two groups (LV main and LVlobe; p<0.0001, WA%seg and WA%sub; p<0.05). Conclusions: Bronchial luminal volumetric assessment better reflected the airflow limitation parameters. Advances in knowledge: Bronchial luminal volumetric assessment can potentially be used to gauge airflow limitation in pulmonary emphysema.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871143320&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871143320&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1259/bjr/22602417
DO - 10.1259/bjr/22602417
M3 - Article
C2 - 22932062
AN - SCOPUS:84871143320
SN - 0007-1285
VL - 85
SP - 1525
EP - 1532
JO - British Journal of Radiology
JF - British Journal of Radiology
IS - 1020
ER -