TY - JOUR
T1 - Total Positive Margin Length as a Novel Prognostic Indicator After Radical Prostatectomy
AU - Hibino, Takafumi
AU - Kato, Masashi
AU - Tsuzuki, Toyonori
AU - Nishikimi, Toshinori
AU - Kimura, Tohru
AU - Komatsu, Tomonori
AU - Hattori, Kyosuke
AU - Naito, Yushi
AU - Sano, Yuta
AU - Inoue, Satoshi
AU - Matsuo, Kazuna
AU - Sano, Tomoyasu
AU - Kimura, Tomokazu
AU - Zennami, Kenji
AU - Ishida, Shohei
AU - Matsukawa, Yoshihisa
AU - Akamatsu, Shusuke
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Japanese Urological Association.
PY - 2026/3
Y1 - 2026/3
N2 - Objectives: Positive surgical margins (PSMs) are associated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP). However, their prognostic significance varies, and not all patients with PSMs experience recurrence. This study aimed to evaluate whether detailed analysis of margin characteristics could improve postoperative risk stratification. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1003 patients who underwent RP without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. PSMs were categorized according to total PSM length (≤ 5 mm vs. > 5 mm), maximum PSM length (≥ 3 mm vs. < 3 mm), primary Gleason pattern (pGP) at PSM (pGP3 vs. pGP4–5), multifocality (single vs. multiple), and location (apex-only vs. others). Other pathological factors analyzed pathological T/N stage, ISUP grade group, and intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P). Results: PSMs were present in 377 patients (37%), Total PSM length was 5.0 (0.1–66) mm and pGP3 was more common in apex-only PSMs. pGS, IDC-P, and PSM status were significant predictors of BCR in the entire cohort. Among margin parameters, total PSM length and pGP at the PSM were the strongest predictors. In organ-confined disease with PSM, BCR risk was significantly stratified into three groups based on total PSM length > 5 mm and pGP4–5 at the margin (0, 1, or 2; p < 0.001). Conclusions: A risk classification incorporating total PSM length and pGP at the margin improves postoperative prognostic stratification for localized prostate cancer with PSMs. In cases with multiple PSMs, total PSM length may be more informative than the maximum PSM length European Association of Urology recommended.
AB - Objectives: Positive surgical margins (PSMs) are associated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP). However, their prognostic significance varies, and not all patients with PSMs experience recurrence. This study aimed to evaluate whether detailed analysis of margin characteristics could improve postoperative risk stratification. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1003 patients who underwent RP without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. PSMs were categorized according to total PSM length (≤ 5 mm vs. > 5 mm), maximum PSM length (≥ 3 mm vs. < 3 mm), primary Gleason pattern (pGP) at PSM (pGP3 vs. pGP4–5), multifocality (single vs. multiple), and location (apex-only vs. others). Other pathological factors analyzed pathological T/N stage, ISUP grade group, and intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P). Results: PSMs were present in 377 patients (37%), Total PSM length was 5.0 (0.1–66) mm and pGP3 was more common in apex-only PSMs. pGS, IDC-P, and PSM status were significant predictors of BCR in the entire cohort. Among margin parameters, total PSM length and pGP at the PSM were the strongest predictors. In organ-confined disease with PSM, BCR risk was significantly stratified into three groups based on total PSM length > 5 mm and pGP4–5 at the margin (0, 1, or 2; p < 0.001). Conclusions: A risk classification incorporating total PSM length and pGP at the margin improves postoperative prognostic stratification for localized prostate cancer with PSMs. In cases with multiple PSMs, total PSM length may be more informative than the maximum PSM length European Association of Urology recommended.
KW - margins of excision
KW - prostatectomy
KW - prostatic neoplasms
KW - recurrence
KW - risk factors
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105032129975
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105032129975#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1111/iju.70395
DO - 10.1111/iju.70395
M3 - Article
C2 - 41795152
AN - SCOPUS:105032129975
SN - 0919-8172
VL - 33
JO - International Journal of Urology
JF - International Journal of Urology
IS - 3
M1 - e70395
ER -