TY - JOUR
T1 - Trauma quality indicators
T2 - internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation
AU - and the WSES Trauma Quality Indicators Expert Panel
AU - Coccolini, Federico
AU - Kluger, Yoram
AU - Moore, Ernest E.
AU - Maier, Ronald V.
AU - Coimbra, Raul
AU - Ordoñez, Carlos
AU - Ivatury, Rao
AU - Kirkpatrick, Andrew W.
AU - Biffl, Walter
AU - Sartelli, Massimo
AU - Hecker, Andreas
AU - Ansaloni, Luca
AU - Leppaniemi, Ari
AU - Reva, Viktor
AU - Civil, Ian
AU - Vega, Felipe
AU - Chiarugi, Massimo
AU - Chichom-Mefire, Alain
AU - Sakakushev, Boris
AU - Peitzman, Andrew
AU - Chiara, Osvaldo
AU - Abu-Zidan, Fikri
AU - Maegele, Marc
AU - Miccoli, Mario
AU - Chirica, Mircea
AU - Khokha, Vladimir
AU - Sugrue, Michael
AU - Fraga, Gustavo P.
AU - Otomo, Yasuhiro
AU - Baiocchi, Gian Luca
AU - Catena, Fausto
AU - Kuliesius, Zygimantas
AU - Conti, Luigi
AU - Dogjani, Agron
AU - Lee, Jae Gil
AU - Consani, Heitor
AU - Russello, Domenico
AU - Bortul, Marina
AU - Maurel, Teresa Gimenez
AU - Kaf, Hossein Samadi
AU - Adamou, Harissou
AU - Alin, Vasilescu
AU - Robustelli, Umberto
AU - Sato, Norio
AU - Seretis, Charalampos
AU - Quiodettis, Martha
AU - Gomes, Carlos Augusto
AU - Kong, Victor
AU - Zakaria, Andee Dzulkarnaen
AU - Kobe, Yoshiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Introduction: Quality in medical care must be measured in order to be improved. Trauma management is part of health care, and by definition, it must be checked constantly. The only way to measure quality and outcomes is to systematically accrue data and analyze them. Material and methods: A systematic revision of the literature about quality indicators in trauma associated to an international consensus conference Results: An internationally approved base core set of 82 trauma quality indicators was obtained: Indicators were divided into 6 fields: prevention, structure, process, outcome, post-traumatic management, and society integrational effects. Conclusion: Present trauma quality indicator core set represents the result of an international effort aiming to provide a useful tool in quality evaluation and improvement. Further improvement may only be possible through international trauma registry development. This will allow for huge international data accrual permitting to evaluate results and compare outcomes.
AB - Introduction: Quality in medical care must be measured in order to be improved. Trauma management is part of health care, and by definition, it must be checked constantly. The only way to measure quality and outcomes is to systematically accrue data and analyze them. Material and methods: A systematic revision of the literature about quality indicators in trauma associated to an international consensus conference Results: An internationally approved base core set of 82 trauma quality indicators was obtained: Indicators were divided into 6 fields: prevention, structure, process, outcome, post-traumatic management, and society integrational effects. Conclusion: Present trauma quality indicator core set represents the result of an international effort aiming to provide a useful tool in quality evaluation and improvement. Further improvement may only be possible through international trauma registry development. This will allow for huge international data accrual permitting to evaluate results and compare outcomes.
KW - Analysis
KW - Data
KW - Morbidity
KW - Mortality
KW - Outcome
KW - Performance
KW - Planning
KW - Product
KW - System
KW - World
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85101919470
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85101919470#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1186/s13017-021-00350-7
DO - 10.1186/s13017-021-00350-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 33622373
AN - SCOPUS:85101919470
SN - 1749-7922
VL - 16
JO - World Journal of Emergency Surgery
JF - World Journal of Emergency Surgery
IS - 1
M1 - 6
ER -