メインナビゲーションにスキップ 検索にスキップ メインコンテンツにスキップ

Which Kt/V is the most valid for assessment of both long mild and short intensive hemodialyses?

  • Toshihiko Miwa
  • , Shigeru Nakai
  • , Masamiki Miwa
  • , Toru Shinzato
  • , Kosei Segawa
  • , Kenji Maeda

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿学術論文査読

抄録

It is unclear at present which mathematical modeling Kt/(V)urea is valid for assessment of both long mild hemodialysis (HD) and short intensive HD, the single-pool modeling Kt/V (Kt/Vsp) based on the pre- and postdialysis serum urea concentrations, double-pool modeling Kt/V (Kt/Vdp) based on the predialysis concentration and the estimated postdialysis equilibrated concentration, or Kt/V calculated on the basis of dialyzer urea clearance, HD session duration and urea distribution volume (Kt/Vdl). Thus, the respective Kt/V during a short intensive HD was compared with its counterpart Kt/V during a long mild HD, where the same amount of urea is removed during both HD treatments. It was found that the Kt/Vsp and Kt/Vdl during short intensive HD were significantly greater than the respective Kt/V during the long mild HD. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the Kt/Vdp between the long mild and short intensive HDs. In conclusion, Kt/Vdp may be more valid for assessment of both long mild and short intensive HDs.

本文言語英語
ページ(範囲)827-831
ページ数5
ジャーナルNephron
92
4
DOI
出版ステータス出版済み - 2002
外部発表はい

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • 生理学
  • 腎臓病学
  • 泌尿器学
  • 生理学(医学)

フィンガープリント

「Which Kt/V is the most valid for assessment of both long mild and short intensive hemodialyses?」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル