抄録
It is unclear at present which mathematical modeling Kt/(V)urea is valid for assessment of both long mild hemodialysis (HD) and short intensive HD, the single-pool modeling Kt/V (Kt/Vsp) based on the pre- and postdialysis serum urea concentrations, double-pool modeling Kt/V (Kt/Vdp) based on the predialysis concentration and the estimated postdialysis equilibrated concentration, or Kt/V calculated on the basis of dialyzer urea clearance, HD session duration and urea distribution volume (Kt/Vdl). Thus, the respective Kt/V during a short intensive HD was compared with its counterpart Kt/V during a long mild HD, where the same amount of urea is removed during both HD treatments. It was found that the Kt/Vsp and Kt/Vdl during short intensive HD were significantly greater than the respective Kt/V during the long mild HD. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the Kt/Vdp between the long mild and short intensive HDs. In conclusion, Kt/Vdp may be more valid for assessment of both long mild and short intensive HDs.
| 本文言語 | 英語 |
|---|---|
| ページ(範囲) | 827-831 |
| ページ数 | 5 |
| ジャーナル | Nephron |
| 巻 | 92 |
| 号 | 4 |
| DOI | |
| 出版ステータス | 出版済み - 2002 |
| 外部発表 | はい |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- 生理学
- 腎臓病学
- 泌尿器学
- 生理学(医学)
フィンガープリント
「Which Kt/V is the most valid for assessment of both long mild and short intensive hemodialyses?」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。引用スタイル
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver